Be an active participant of SIOE

From SIOE 

It’s a fact that the opponents of our project, Stop islamisation of Europe, are many and strong. EU, UN and governments who cowardly have sold their populations to islam. They don’t want our project and wish to stop us by all means. We saw it clearly at the 9/11 demo. It was pretty easy for our opponents to decimate the number of people attending from expected 20.000 demonstrators to a number between 400 and 500:
At first Thielemans banned the demo. Then the court wouldn’t take the final decision, and various politicians tried to slow down SIOEs process. Furthermore rumours of terrorattacks appeared which were not confirmed at all by the police. And finally, American foreign policy forces were interfering. Apart from wanting to stop the islamisation their first priority is still American foreign politics. Now they try to unite anti-islamic parties in EU, which apparently seems as a good idea, but remember, their efforts will still be on their terms.

SIOE wants something else. We see ourselves as an european grassroot movement, wishing to unite the europeans, putting all disagreements aside and work for the most important thing in Europe right now, to stop the islamisation of Europe. A movement free from political forces. Politicians and parties are always for sale in one way or another.

SIOE has learned from it’s mistakes, and is now presenting a non-hierarchal organisation where all dedicated people are in direct contact with the founders of SIOE. There will be a weekly skype cast, where updates will be provided on SIOE, the demos and the last progresses.

 

(It’s free to download Skype, and free to use. All you need is a headset (cheap), to be able to communicate via your computer)

Advantages by joining a SIOE skype cast group:

• You will get the latest news on SIOE demonstrations and events
• You have the possibility to come with suggestions for new SIOE events
• You will get the latest news from other countries from the members of your SIOE skypegroup
• You will get equalminded friends all over Europe and other countries
• You are a part of an equalminded community who have one common aim: To stop the islamisation of Europe.
• You’ll meet your skypegroup to the next demonstration
   

There will be established groups with ten persons in each group, and they will be from various countries, the main language in the beginning will be english, the group will be called and get 5 min. update on our demos and SIOE news, then there will be 5 min. discussion and then the group will be in contact with eachother the rest of the week discussing and getting new ideas to propose. This will also give a possibility for good friendships with people from other countries and people will look forward to meet eachother at the next demonstration.

When you got your skype name, then e-mail it to sioe@siad.dk

Ramallah-Lynch Terrorist Nabbed

 

The Ramallah Lynching

IDF soldiers have arrested the last of the Palestinian Authority (PA) terrorists responsible for the brutal lynching of two IDF reservists in Ramallah seven years ago.

Soldiers apprehended 36-year-old Tanzim terrorist Hayman Zaben in Shechem early Wednesday.  Zaben was one of those responsible for bludgeoning to death IDF reservists Vadim Nurzitz and Yossi Avrahami in a PA police station in Ramallah in October, 2000.

The two Israeli reserve soldiers had accidentally entered PA-controlled Ramallah, just six miles north of Jerusalem, and were arrested by PA police. It was once they were in custody that the lynch occurred.

TV images of the lynching show a body of one of the two Israelis being tossed from the police station window to a mob of local Arabs who beat the soldiers’ bodies with anything they could get their hands on. The mob is seen waving body parts in the air and proudly displaying their blood-soaked hands to their comrades

Read the whole article here and watch the video (Warning: Extremely graphic)

Eurabia: Our liking for submission

by Anders Bruun Laursen

As you know Islam means submission. This submission-mania has befallen our politicians and media – under the name of “appeasement”, the effect being dictatorial appeasement of the indigenous peoples by all means and a futile attempt to purchase the loyalty of the Muslim immigrants. As history shows appeasement, alias cowardly buying our lives at the cost of our souls, always leads to a submission so intolerable that an unnecessary, bloody war ensues:

To show you our submissiveness I shall now repeat 

Some of our elected leaders’ statements:.                                         

Former Prime Minister, Tony Blair :      

1 a. “The most remarkable thing about reading the Koran – in so far as it can be truly translated from the original Arabic – is to understand how progressive it is. http://surl.se/crcq , http://surl.se/eeyp  pp. 12-13. “I speak with great diffidence and humility as a member of another faith. I am not qualified to make any judgements. But as an outsider, the Koran strikes me as a reforming book, trying to return Judaism and Christianity to their origins, rather as reformers attempted with the Christian Church centuries later. It is inclusive. It extols science and knowledge and abhors superstition. It is practical and way ahead of its time in attitudes to marriage, women and governance,” he said. He added that under the guidance of the Qur’an, the spread of Islam and its dominance over previously Christian or pagan lands was “breathtaking”. “Over centuries it founded an Empire, leading the world in discovery, art and culture. We look back to the early Middle Ages, the standard bearers of tolerance at that time were far more likely to be found in Muslim lands than in Christian,” he declared.

1 b. “A Muslim could one day be Prime Minister” (of the UK), Tony Blair said on Dec. 8, 2006. The Premier also said he would not mind if any of his children wanted to marry a Muslim. Well, the Blair family is catholic- more or less. Marrying into a Muslim family means unconditional submission to Muhammad´s rules, i.e. abandoning one´s Christian faith, even an obligation to fight Christians!! A Muslim is not allowed to marry or make friends with an infidel (Quran sure 2:221, 3:28, 3:118, 4: 89, 5:51). Allah has no son (sura 4:171) and thus cannot be the father of Jesus Christ. Allah calls for Muslims to curse infidels (sura 3:61). Allah /Muhammad even demands Muslims to “cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority (sura 3:151, 8:60). Their abode will be the Fire”. “How can there be a league, before Allah and His Messenger, with the Pagans, except those with whom ye made a treaty near the sacred Mosque?” (sura 9:7). Even “fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)” (sura 9:5). What Tony Blair wishes his children to do is 1. to trample on the Christian cross. And 2. his daughter (if he has one) to become the property of a man, who has the obligation to castigate her ( sura 4:34) and “If any of your women are guilty of lewdness …….., confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way (sura 4:15).

I do not believe, that Tony Blair really would wish this for his children. So his statements should rather be seen  as submission : a. public hypocrisy to please the Muslims or/and  2. an expression of a disastrous ignorance of our leaders – leading to our disaster.
Tony Blair said the UK were a better society now than 30 years ago, that offensive remarks and stupid stereotypes were driven out of everyday conversation. Mr Blair pleased Muslims members of his audience by referring to extremists as a “fringe element” http://surl.se/eeyq  .                                                            

2. UK-secretary of State, Margaret Beckett (On July 7, 2006 in the Danish newspaper, Jyllands-Posten): “Our relationship today with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, has grown still deeper since the London bombs.”

3. Danish Foreign Minister (FM) , Moeller – according to Danish professor Bent Jensen, Jyllands-Posten , Nov. 26, 2005 : “The Christian civilization is under pressure. However FM not being for a religious war in the 21. century, he wants to pay the Arabs off through a special appropriation of about 100 million kroner for the Arab countries in the finance budget. “It is Europe´s task to foster tolerance and understanding and to tell the Muslims that they have no right to demand us to live as they want. We shall not try to convert them, but we shall be allowed to be left alone from their attempts to convert us. “The next time we shall be the losers: Then we old men shall have to stand up against an overwhelming crowd of Muslims!”
Such a policy is clearly defeatistic.           

4. Former Swedish Minister Jens Orback: “We must be open and tolerant to Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so to us.” http://surl.se/eeys

Now, see the excuses of our politicians for drowning our countries in a continuous surge of Muslim immigration

What makes our politicians so submissive on our behalf? Fear? Of  whom? Bribery? Islam is never more dangerous than our politicians allow it to be. Who believes in our politicians´ usual excuses for the Muslim mass-immigration? a. Lack of labour: in Denmark the employment rate among non-Western immigrants is 46% as compared with 77% among Danes.b. Lack of people to nurse us as we grow old: Muslim women deliberately avoid nursing  due to religious ban to even look at male genitals. c. We despearately need a larger common market in order to compete with the USA, China etc. The Muslim countries are – and will remain – impoverished bad buyers and producers and costly for us due to Islam, which suppresses any development, and due to unhampered baby-boom in these populations. D. Cultural enrichment: We have only seen an enriched criminality due to the Muslim mass immigration. What we shall see is the destruction of Western way of life. E. The Arabs could boycot our oil supplies – as in 1973. Well – in 1973 Sheik Yamani, the Saudi Oil Minister, did his utmost to prevent oil shortage in the West. It was the Bilderbergers lead by Henry Kissinger, who wanted a qudrupling of oil prices (Andreas von Rétyi, “Bilderberger”, Kopp, Rottenburg 2006 ). I guess that the Arab oil princes would suffer more than we in an oil boycot, as they would miss our money to feed their hungry masses. Which would soon lead to revolution!                                                                                                                          

But Mr. Tony Blairs statements (1. a and b.) do indeed indicate another and much more likely reason:

Islam protecting us infidels, the wrongly romanced Golden Andalusia (711-1492 A.D.) being seen as the society model of the 21. century by the globalists/New World Order

(mentioned 5 times by Pres. Bush sen. 1990-1991 http://surl.se/eeyt ) for their dictatorial one-world state governed by a small clique of bankers and their followers in their Euromediterranean/Eurabian wonderland http://surl.se/eeyy . Although according to Bat Ye´or Golden Andalusia was the longest nightmare for non-muslims in history.
In the wake of the “Muhammad-crisis” in 2006, as Danish flags and Danish embassies were being burnt by furious Muslim crowds in the Middle East and North Africa  Danish industrialists appeared on TV, blubberingly demanding the Danish government to react and excuse for the Muhammad-cartoons: Danish industry were about to lose about poor 2 billion kroner a year because of a Muslim boycot! Then 3 hours later Bill Clinton expressed his sympathy with the poor , violated Muslims on TV and told Denmark to be ashamed of itself. Wherupon the Danish Prime Minister appeared on TV about 3 hours after that – deeply shaken. For the first time, he now personally dissociated himself from the cartoons and the unconditional freedom of expression under responsibility to court secured by our Constitution. One hour later the newspaper, which had published the cartoons, apologized to the Muslims for having violated their feelings! And this although on the same morning in its leader the newspaper had declined any apology whatsoever to the Muslims for the cartoons!

                                                
Why did Bill Clinton interfere ? On September 11, 2001, the Melbourne Age reported on former President Bill Clinton’s speech to an Australian confab: “The [former] president believes the world will be a better place if all borders are eliminated – from a trade perspective, from the viewpoint of economic development and in welcoming [the free movement of] people from other cultures and countries,” Mr. Hogan said. Mr. Clinton showed an understanding of the political problems Australia faced, but said he supported the ultimate wisdom of a borderless world for people and for trade. I could refer to many similar statements by Mr. Clinton´s highly influential chums. Here is just one more: “Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” –David Rockefeller, MEMOIRS, page 405  http://surl.se/efzd . Islam with its bid for world domination is simply the ram of the globalists to batter the obstacles – the national state and Christianity – to their merging goal. These rich and influential people despise democracy – and like a society where the rich Sheikhs have a good time.

Is the Muslim mass immigration a gain for us? Or a tribute to the Muslims?

In Sweden in 1999, 14% of the GNP was spent on immigrants – as compared with 7% in 1990 . Sweden used 267 billion kroner a year on immigration in 1999 – only stating 7 billions in the official budget! http://surl.se/eezr .This squandering was financed by increasing the rate of taxation from 48 to 54%, among other things.                                

The Danish social state is severely threatened, because of costs amounting to a huge part of the state budget , which is 600 billion kroner a year (2007). In 2001 Denmark´s expenditures for immigrants – nearly exclusively for the 11% Muslim immigrants and naturalized Muslims http://surl.se/eltr – were 150 billion kroner http://surl.se/eezs or about 40 % of the Danish wellfare expenditures. However, only 11 billions appeared on the official state budget!! In both EU-countries hospitals, patients, children, old people, schools etc. are at a loss, having their budgets cut every year – due to increasing immigrant-costs. In return for our tributes to Islam we receive ever increasing violence and the contempt of the Muslims we wish to help in our “goodness”. And the sharia is being peacemeal introduced, the schools of Copenhagen already nearly exclusively serving halal-food – an all Danish poultry being blessed in the name of “Allah – the Greatest”!
This false belief in buying ones freedom is not new, as shown in this poem by Rudyard Kipling – of as much current interest as ever before. Although being a Dane I agree with Kipling:

Dane-geld ( the predecessor of present-day Muslim-geld)
It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
To call upon a neighbour and to say:–
“We invaded You last night–we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless You pay us cash to go away.

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
and the people who ask for it explain
That You have only to pay them the Dane-geld
And then You will get rid of the Dane!

It is allways a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say:–
“Though we know we should defeat You,
we have not the time to meet You
We will therefor pay You cash to go away.”

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we have proved it again and again,That if once You have paid him the dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temtation in the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray;
So when You are requested to pay up or be molested,
You will find a better policy to say:–

!We never pay ANY-ONE Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost:
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that pays it is lost!!”
 

Egypt Jails Two Christian Activists for ‘Defaming Islam’

National American Coptic Assembly 
NACA 
Washington DC 
MR , Morris Sadek Esq    president    
morrissadek@gmail.com   
morrissadek@yahooo.com  

DR, ADEL FAWZY and PETER AZZAT in EGYPT JAIL 

Written by AINA.org   
Wednesday, 26 September 2007

Cairo — An Egyptian court has extended the jail term of two Christian human rights activists who were arrested and imprisoned on charges of defaming Islam last month, a member of a Christian group said Wednesday.
The human rights activists, Adel Fawzy Faltas and Peter Ezzat, have been in jail since Aug 8 for defaming Islam, Wajih Yakub, a member of the Middle East Christians Association (MECA), said.
A state security court on Sep 20 extended their jail term for 15 more days, according to Yakub.
Faltas and Ezzat, members of the Canada-based association, have been accused by Egypt’s state security prosecutors of propagating anti-Islamic material and threatening social peace.

Stop for mosque building in Europe!

A message to our European Union leaders (elected or otherwise)

No more mosques in the European Union until we see churches, temples and synagogues in Mecca

SIOE is applying to hold a demonstration in Marseilles on Saturday 8th December 2007.

This is the closest Saturday to Saint Nicholas Day, which is widely celebrated in Southern France.

The application is in two stages and the first stage is underway.

Until the second stage is completed we are unable to give precise times and locations.

As in other European cities, a large mosque is planned to be built in Marseilles, which SIOE considers to be one of the many tactics used in the Islamisation of Europe.

Many Islamist projects are known to have been funded by Saudi Arabia, which as the world knows, forbids any other religion within its borders.

Indeed, non-Muslims are not even allowed to travel in a large part of Saudi Arabia and are prevented from practising their religion in a purpose-built place of worship.

In fact, if any non-Muslim is caught demonstrating his/her own religion in the slightest way, he/she faces deportation, imprisonment or worse.

The European Union proclaims itself to be a bastion of freedom and tolerance, but such principles should extend beyond the borders of this “Union of nations”.

Instead we see an encroachment of Islamism on our ways of life with no reciprocity in Islamic countries, which are increasingly gravitating towards the Saudi Arabian Islamist philosophy.

Increasingly we see non-Islamic religious artefacts being destroyed or vandalised in Islamic countries.

Our European Union leaders should be demanding that Islamic countries like Saudi Arabia build Buddhist temples on their soil, rather than blowing up Buddhist statues.

Bridge building does not mean non-Islamic countries dumping mosques, often huge ones, all over Europe.

It also means Islamic countries building Hindu and Buddhist temples, synagogues, churches and other non-Islamic places of worship within their borders.

The SIOE Marseilles demonstration is to peacefully protest against the large mosque planned for the city being built.

Islamo-fascism Awareness week

 

The next SIOE demonstration is planned for London on 26th October.

SIOE groups in other countries are urged to hold demonstrations in their own cities, if not on the same day then as close to it as possible.

This date is to coincide with:-

1. Islamo-fascism Awareness week (22nd – 26th October) where conferences, rallies and other events are scheduled across the USA http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=5EC88545-3022-47F9-8213-38314CCA6F09

2 The pro-referendum rally on the 27th October http://www.proreferendumrally.co.uk/

This was to help people to attend both without incurring additional travel costs or the use of two weekends.

I am unable to give precise locations and times until final approval of the Metropolitan Police and other authorities, but the formal application has been made.

The subject of the demonstration is Islamic Persecution.

Political parties are not welcome, but individuals may attend.

Persecuted minority groups likely to be represented are

Armenians
Assyrians
Copts
Hindus
Sikhs
Indonesian Christians

And others

There will be speakers from these groups.

If any persecuted non-Islamic group wishes to be represented please contact SIOE England directly.

There will be a contingent of people opposed to Turkey’s entry into the European Union.

Flags of persecuted groups will be permitted, subject to prior approval.

Banners highlighting the plight of persecuted minorities in Islamic countries are permitted.

SIOE banners and slogans obviously are permitted and may be obligatory if other banners are used.

Eyewitness report from Schuman Place 9/11 2007

I was at the Brussel Demonstration against the Islamisation of Europe which took place and was arrested by the police just as the police began ( as a matter of fact, you can see me getting arrested on the Euronews report !). It’s important to understand that initially this demonstration had been banned in august by Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans. It wasn’t banned however, out of fear of Neo Nazi or right wing extremist, as the media would now have people believe. It was banned, officially, because of fear the local immigrant population would react violently if islam was being criticized. Oddly, this confirmed the organizers belief that Islam and democracy can’t match because of the nature of Islamic teachings. Anyway, people decided to go ahead with the demonstration.
I had come from Lille, France with a friend. We reached place du luxembourg by car around 11.00 am. The place was swarming with policemen and journalists. At that time, we were only looking for a parking space but the mere fact of having a foreign licence plate and stopping for an instant immediately drew a journalist ( I guess, who filmed us).

Looking for a parking space gave us the opportunity to realize how big was law enforcement mobilization. There were tens of police vans parked in the neighborrod. At many crossroads, plainclothes officers were standing, obviously or not so obviously.

Eventually, we reached the place to “take the temperature”. It was very quiet around 11.30 but there were already journalists conducting some interviews, and isolated demonstrators wandering. We found each other through eye contact. I met a couple of guys from the french speaking side of belgium and, eventually, a women with who I talked in english : She’d flew from spain to take part in the demonstration.

As noon came, I decided to go back to the car and get a huge sign I had prepared for the demonstration, showing a bearded musulim about to eat up Europe. I actually had wrapped it in a sheet in order to show it only at the last minute. Now there were a bit police had allready arrested two persons who carried signs. I saw the police had isolted a few youths who might be trouble. Well, Since my sign was conceiled, I felt it was allright and I went to sit on a public bench.

It was hard to make out other demonstrators : Many people, like me and my friend, or the spanish woman, or the belgs I met, had come in small group or as individuals, obviously responding the call on the internet as private “citizens” (whatever citizenry may mean in Eurabia). Journalists were all over, adding to the confusion. A belge sitting on the bench next to me was being interviewed and then came my turn.

- So, the woman asked me, why do you come here today”

The first thing that came to my mind wasn’t even islamisation of europe ! I explained I’d come out of concern for my freedom of speech. The fact that the Demonstration was banned because it was about a politically incorrect topic was reason enough to go. Anyway… I’d just said this when a police officer came up to me asking what was on my sign. I said this was none of his business and I was a private citizen in a public space. Needless to say, I was right away seized by the police officers and dragged toward a police van. From that moment on, All I could do was to scream on top of My lung “I didn’t harm anybody, what have I done wrong, I didn’t even shout a slogan, this is the capital of Europe, Vive la démocracy, vive la liberté” The scene, eventually, made Euronews that evening !

I had screamed “Vive la Liberté” : it was therefore logical that I found myself with plastic handcuffs around the wrists, placed under administrativ arrest. On my tag, the officer wrote the hour at which I’d been arrested : noon sharp !

From then on, Like tens of other demonstrators, I found myself in a cell at Brussels’s ill named “palais de justice”, turned for the ocvcasion into a “hall of shame”. As a companion of cell screamed : “Now I’m free to speak up my mind : I’m behind bars”. Soon, we were about 150 to 200 people locked in cells.

I think what happened on th 9/11 was a day of shame for Europe. It showed what free speech really looks like in countries were politicians bow to muslim pressure. After all, let’s not forget the march was banned out of fear of muslim violence in the street of Brussel. I also think there was real concern that citizens from all over europe might meet each other, socialize, and eventually that some form of organized resistance to islamization might rise on a european scale – that propably is one of the Eurocrats worst nightmare. I think it was no wasted time going there. For a few minutes, the true face of european “democracy” was revealed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUrOUcEk19U

Bruno G.

The Iran Conundrum

  

by Amil Imani 

Underneath all conquests and expansions, underneath all the frivolous wars over religious differences, underneath all the oppression and tyranny, underneath all the motives of greed for wealth, underneath all the wars over injustices, lies one single drive:  to dominate. The passion to dominate, control and rule over one’s fellow humans is an ancient impulse. It goes back to prehistoric times when certain individuals had the desire to force their will upon those around them.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is not an exception to this rule. They, too, have ruled over defenseless Iranians for nearly 29 years with iron fists and absolute power and are not ready to relinquish this power before taking down millions of innocent lives with them.
 
The 7th century barbaric ruling of Sharia has caused millions of Iranians to flee their country. Those remaining have been subject to mass slaughtering, thousands upon thousands of fabricated arrests and thousands more torn away from their homes and their families. They have been subjected to tortures, made to confess to crimes they never committed, and then been either exterminated or sent back to medieval Islamic torture chambers where they simply faded away. It is difficult for many people to even talk about these horrible tragedies and genocides, which continue to exist to this date in Iran.

http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=78&Itemid=2

Islamic threat against Madonna and Britney

“If I meet Madonna and Britney Spears, it will be an honour for me to behead these two whores, if they continue spreading out their satanic culture attack against Islam”.

Quotation:

Muhammad Abdel-Al, the head of the Palestinian terrorist group, the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC).

The statement appeared in connection with the singer Madonna’s journey to Israel where she would participate in a Kabbala meeting.

The Kabbala is the book about the Jewish mysterious tradition.

The two famous singers, Madonna and Britney Spears are called “lesbian whores” and they must be beheaded.  Muhammad Abdel-Al states that he personally would like to carry out the beheading.

According to the Koran there is death penalty for homosexuality, as it is seen as a crime.

Hopefully these cruel statements will make some teenagers think twice before they praise the multicultural society, which in Denmark means monoculture, with Islam on board.

From SIOEs demonstration in Brussels

One minutes silence in respect for the 9/11 victims

Let us make it completely clear. There was only one SIOE demonstration: The demonstration planned for a long time that was advertised as starting from Luxembourg Place in Brussels.

Although Mayor Thielemans disallowed SIOE’s demonstration, it certainly lived up to all the rules SIOE had promised the Brussels police.

Vlaams Belang had repeatedly tried to persuade SIOE to hold only a static demonstration on Schumann Square outside the commission, suggesting that some agreement had been reached with the Brussels police about this.

Nevertheless, SIOE stood firm on its demand for marching from Luxembourg Square to Schumann Square.  

We believe, therefore, that Vlaams Belang attempted to hijack SIOE’s demonstration because they knew that they could publicise their own domestic political agenda, on the back of the world news generated by our protest.

SIOE had given political parties the chance to show they are really serious in wanting Stop Islamisation Of Europe, by putting their other political aspirations to one side. 

However, Vlaams Belang clearly was unable to do this.

  

SIOE’s demonstration was completely peaceful.  

When Anders Gravers and Stephen Gash arrived to Luxembourg Place they were greeted by high-ranking police officers who announced that “the demonstration was forbidden” but that we would be tolerated if we stayed on Luxembourg Square and abided by our own aims and rules, which of course we did.
As the safety of its supporters and public order has always been paramount in SIOE’s organisation of the demonstration, SIOE complied with police instructions at all times without question, and had a peaceful demonstration in Luxembourg Place.

SIOE can only praise the police for their efforts.

The police only made a couple of administrative arrests of single persons that apparently had not understood SIOE’s rule of only displaying SIOE’s slogans on banners.
 
 

With this gathering we have proved to the world, Belgium and Mayor Thielemans, that SIOE can conduct demonstrations where peaceful ordinary people may respectfully deliver their messages to our politicians.  

We did exactly that when a petition of 10,000 signatures complaining about Mayor Thielemans’s decision to ban the 9/11 demo was passed on to Gerard Batten MEP who will raise the matter of Mayor Thielemans’s prohibition in the parliament, in order to secure the right of peaceful people to gather and express their freedom of speech according to the EU-constitution.  

Mr Batten ensured the petition was handed to Mayor Thielemans’s office.

SIOE does not wish to be associated with Vlaams Belang who held its own separate demonstration on Schumann Square. 

Firstly, because we believe they obviously did not respect police instructions and secondly, we consider they vandalised SIOE’s efforts by holding their own demonstration, thereby distracting the both media and, more seriously, demonstrators who genuinely only wish to Stop Islamisation Of Europe.

Why couldn’t Vlaams Belang have made a demonstration some other day? 

Why did they have to use the same time and SIOE’s slogans?    The reason can surely only be that they deliberately tried to use SIOE to get in the media’s spotlight.  

Whatever the reasons SIOE considers Vlaams Belang’s action to have been irresponsible and reprehensible.

This is why SIOE strongly disassociates itself from the Vlaams Belang demonstration that displayed Flemish flags, contrary to SIOE’s aims and rules that allowed people regardless of race, religion and political convictions to unite and say “no” to the insidious Islamisation of our societies, without the baggage of political parties. That is to say a wide front with a single goal, to Stop Islamisation Of Europe. 

Therefore, it is disappointing that both the Brussels Journal and Gates of Vienna have stubbornly claimed that Schumann Square was the meeting place despite SIOE not having mentioned this place as an assembly point.  

It’s also disappointing to see Gates of Vienna and Centre for Vigilant Freedom write about the two different demonstrations as if they were a single one.  

SIOE is now establishing new branches in Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, France and Italy.   

Now is the time to create a non-party-political organization with only one goal, to stop the Islamisation of our countries.

By popular demand we will be establishing a subscription membership scheme. 

SIOE has decided, for the present time, not to co-operate with political parties in the future but only with individuals and organizations that share our wish for stopping the Islamisation of Europe, unless we have a written agreement drawn up by SIOE and signed by the leaders of the parties.
In other words a legally binding contract on SIOE’s terms.
However our main goal is still to attract ordinary people who wish to Stop Islamisation Of Europe.

The 4th Empire

   

   Islamism,                  nazism,              communism,  political correctness

Let me begin by explaining the headline.

The 4th Empire is to be understood as an extension of the 3rd Empire, which was the Nazi dream empire. The intention is to focus on the fact that we are dealing with a totalitarian regime that wishes world dominance. At the same time the headline is meant as a reminder that there is a 4th totalitarian “-ism” although we don’t often consider it as such.

Of course we know the three great totalitarian ”-isms” – Islam, Communism and Nazism.

The headline becomes a bit misleading since the Nazis did not include Islam or Communism in their idea of “the empires”. But the poetry was too tempting to let that detail get in the way.

But as mentioned we know three great totalitarian movements, Nazism, Communism and Islam.

What they have in common is the idea that state and god are seen as a unity, morality and law are seen the same way.

Their approaches are a bit different.

Communism and Nazism both derive from a philosophical tradition with common roots in Hegel’s idea, that the individual must submit to the state and the state must present itself as god.´

Islam on the other hand has its basis in a ”god’s law” that is to become manifest within the state.
For people who live in a dictatorship it doesn’t matter if it is god who is to be the state or the other way round, at least when it comes to personal freedom.

The 4th totalitarian movement, of course, is: Political Correctness. It is as dangerous as the three others and therefore we should be aware of it.

Usually political correctness is not considered totalitarian.

Actually it is constantly excused and defended by both politicians and most of the media. This is because we live in the middle of it. The politically correct movement controls most of the media and the majority of our politicians as well as our educational institutions.

It is fairly easy for the henchmen of the movement to marginalise and demonise people who think differently.

As in every other totalitarian mindset political correctness has its ways to control its people.

But where other totalitarian movements threatened with and often really put to death its apostates or ‘unacceptables’, political correctness is content with the use of marginalisation and demonising as means of control.

And in that way political correctness may seem milder than the three others.

But marginalisation and demonising are not necessarily milder punishments than death.  It seems fair to assume that by far most people spend more time and energy worrying about what other people think of them, than they worry about dying.

Those priorities, of course, can change if you live close to death. But I still dare claim that marginalisation is a more efficient threat than death.

As in other totalitarian societies the politically correct version gives clear benefits for its own.  If you have the ”right” opinions many doors in society open to you.

It is possible to become a journalist without being able to write anything but bromides.

It is possible to become a politician without being able to speak anything but nonsense.

It is even possible to become an expert without knowing anything at all about the subject you are an expert on.

It goes almost without saying that you are in the cold if you don’t follow “the party line”.

Demonising is important in totalitarian mindsets.

Communists have:                    Capitalists and the Anti-socials.

Islam has:                                  the Infidels and the Apostates.

The Nazis have:                        the Jews and the Communists.

The Politically Correct have:   the Nazis and the Racists.

It is completely possible that totalitarian movements can use each other as scapegoats.

Demonising is of course reduced to some kind of invective which does not necessarily have a firm meaning. If they had a firm meaning it would be far more difficult to use them tyrannically.

They simply end up meaning ”opponent”.

But why have the politically correct chosen Nazism as a demonising concept and not Communism or Islam?
I think it is because political correctness does not want to engage in battle with existing totalitarian movements.

Communism and Islam are around today and are able to defend themselves and retaliate against demonising.

Nazism is an easy victim.
By attacking Nazism political correctness can appear anti-totalitarian without getting at odds with their totalitarian brothers. The few Nazis that exist are not a political factor.

It is obvious that sooner or later political correctness will go against both Islam and Communism. It is just a temporary, rhetorical peace. Before that happens the last remnant of freedom in the western world has to be eradicated.

This is why anti-islamic movements, such as ’Trykkefrihedsselskabet’, ’Den Danske Forening’, ’SIAD’ and ’Dansk Folkeparti’ are called Nazi in the 4th empire despite their comdemnation of totalitarian ideologies such as Nazism.

Saboteur or coward?

Is Udo Ulfkotte exercising dhimmi-status?

Statement from Anders Gravers and Stephen Gash regarding Udo Ulfkotte’s behaviour.

We started SIOE to be an umbrella organisation bringing together groups and people from a wide range of political, religious and cultural practices, but who are united in the single issue of stopping Islamisation of Europe.

We invited Udo Ulfkotte to join our team because he promised much in the way of influential contacts.

From the start we (Anders and Stephen) have worked as a team and communicated daily on developments and direction.

This was never the case with Udo Ulfkotte.  Although he corresponded with Anders fairly regularly he was never fully forthcoming with any news regarding contacts, for example, or interest shown by the media.

This made it difficult for us if the media contacted us with respect to Ulfkotte’s statements, because although the media heard them, we did not.

Ulfkotte is not a team player in our opinion and this has been shown to its extreme over the last few days with him appearing on media outlets, especially in Belgium, saying HE cancelled the demonstration.

At no time did he seek permission from us to make such an outrageous statement, and he had no authority to do so.

He was declaring to the media that the demonstration had been cancelled, even though the final judicial verdict had yet to be made.

He could not have done a better job of trying to make the court case fail to reach a verdict in our favour and undermine SIOE’s lawyer’s attempts to reinstate the march.

We regard his behaviour as despicable and we both regard Ulfkotte as a Judas to the cause of anti-Islamism.

We regard his conduct to be calculated in making the demonstration fail.

Why this is so, we are still investigating. He may be employed by the European Intelligence Agencies, he supposedly acts as a consultant to, or it may be solely due to him selfishly pursuing his own political career.

There may be a more sinister reason, but we don’t actually know because he hasn’t had the guts to tell us.

Udo Ulfkotte has declared he intends to start and lead a political party to combat Islamism.

We believe he couldn’t lead a starving donkey to grass.  He is a director of Pax Europa.  Well, we believe he couldn’t direct a drinking straw into a bottle.

Once again we say, “If Udo Ulfkotte is the best Germany has, to combat the Islamisation of Germany, then God help Germany!”

In his pathetic utterances about cancelling the Brussels demo, Ulfkotte stated it was because of terrorist threats.

This is exactly why SIOE was set up. Terrorist threats are part and parcel of Islamism and we knew that millions of European people are willing to stand up to such threats.

However, Udo Ulfkotte is not one of them.  A few days ago he was telling us by telephone he “never intended to split SIOE’s effort,” when explaining why he organised a Cologne demonstration for 11th September, without telling either of us he was doing so.

He went on to say “I will be in Brussels, of course”, then the next day he is telling the media “I have cancelled the Brussels demonstration”.

Ulfkotte is in no position to cancel the Brussels demo.  The Brussels demo was our initiative, not Ulfkotte’s.  We decided the place and date; we drew up the Aims and Rules, not Ulfkotte.

His input has proved to be minimal and now he is doing his best to ruin our efforts.

He is nothing more than a saboteur who is doing no favours for the people of Germany, let alone Europe.

In our opinion he is a pathetic coward and German people would be best advised to avoid him and his future political party, unless they wish to endure an existence under Sharia law.

“We still remember the Berlin Wall”

 From “A concerned Dane”

A year and a half ago, most of the islamic world turned all their hate againts Denmark, due to some drawings of the socalled prophet Mohammed, in a Danish Newspaper.
 

It struck me, that when you really take a deep look, this tendency is known in an other, and many more, cotexts. But the one that popps up in mind, is the teenagegirl with low selfworth, that on one hand wants to be accepted and recognized by the surroundings. But on the other hand wants to break the mirror because she doesn´t like what she is seeing, and in a moment of craziness breaks the mirror.
 

This is not in any way ment to be a low argumented point of view wanting to call Mohammed a girlie.
 

But it is ment to be an eyeopener for the fact, that many of the things muslims “believe” in, is things, thoughts and point of views that in many other contexts would cause a removal to a psycriatic hospital for the person(s) sharing the contents of his head.
 

Let us begin with the beginning. Mohammed heard voices in his head from God. Allready here you can stop and stamp this as mental illness. There are thousands of sick people around the world having treatment at hospitals because they have heard voices from God. And the bottom line is, that all of these voices are not more than pictures made by the subconcioness ment to compensate for something else, that is the really problem. Example, Mohammeds parents dies early, so the story says. His subconsioness makes a picture to adore- in this story a Allah, whom a psycriatist just would call an ideal picture of the missing father, given a divine status and now Mohammed has a picture to look at, and now he forgets the fact that the father is dead. But that fact still remains behind the pretty picture of God, and sometimes the cruel truth comes to the surface, and Mohammed makes the classic defence – push it back where it came from, behind the picture, instead of dealing with the real problem. And to make equality the next picture of God has to be even more shining to light up the darkness that it is really ment to shine above.

Stay the Hands of the Murdering Mullahs

Amil Imani, an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America encourage people to sign a petition against the murdering mullahs.:

To:  Individuals, Human Rights Organizations, and Governments
The life that God gives, no man should extinguish. The blood-thirsty mullahs presently ruling Iran blatantly violate this sacred covenant by executing large numbers of people ranging from petty criminals to political opponents. The mullahs and their mercenaries are wasting precious human life to maintain themselves in power through terrorizing the population.

Mass public hangings, as well as secret executions in prisons, are routine in the tyrannical Islamic Republic of Iran. Recently Majid Kavousifar, 28, and his nephew, Hossein Kavousifar, 24, were hanged for the alleged murder of a hard-line judge, Hassan Moghaddas, a mullah-judge notorious for jailing and condemning to death political dissidents. The victims were hanged from cranes and hoisted high above one of Tehran’s busiest thoroughfares. This “judge” had repeatedly bragged publicly that he often issued a death verdict without even examining the charges against the individual. The Islamic Republic of Iran has the dubious distinction of executing more children, those under the age of 18, than any other country in the world. Such is the plight of the Iranian people.

Robert Tait of The Observer reported on August 19, 2007 from Tehran that “Iran Hangs 30 Over ‘US Plots.’” Accusing political dissidents as being agents of the U.S. and hanging them without even a semblance of due process is a heinous crime that every descent human being should do all he/she can to end.

“Injustice anywhere is threat to justice everywhere,” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. warned us. Silence, complacency and indifference invariably play into the hands and schemes of tyrants. History is replete with cases of tyranny gathering momentum in the face of inaction by others, spreading far and wide and visiting great catastrophes on people.

We are also reminded by Albert Einstein, “The world is a dangerous place not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”

It is imperative that we do all we can, as individuals, organizations, and governments to stay the hands of the murdering mullahs in Iran, before their thirst for blood leads their campaign of oppression and death to the four corners of the globe.

We the petitioners demand:

* Immediate disbanding of capital punishment in the Islamic Republic of Iran and wherever else in the world this inhuman act is practiced.

* No summary judgments to be made about any accused without thorough and open trials with the fundamental assumption of innocence until proven otherwise.

* The authorities who issue death warrants of others must be held accountable for their actions.
Sincerely,

Sign petition here: http://www.petitiononline.com/achat49/petition.html

Italy-news by “Lepanto”

Lepanto, where christians stopped the turkish jihad in 1571.

ANOTHER CLASH OF CULTURE
 
There’re something innerend into italian’s blood against Islam. Mainly because we are in the centre of Mediterrean,
our ancient “Mare nostrum” and nowadays “mare Islamicus” thanxs to boat people and islamic culture that conquered and removed any christians and romans teaching over there.
 

And after enslavements, conquers, attacks from islamic thugs (Saracens or Turks doesn’t matter, Always Islam is )
We are obviously worried about the presence of menaceous muslim community.
 

http://www.tgcom.mediaset.it/cronaca/articoli/articolo376122.shtml
 

Unfortunately our beautiful capital, Rome, the centre of Catholic Christianity, is target by heavy non christians immigration, mainly muslims.
 

Bengalese community wanted building of new mosque on one of the seven hystorical hills of Rome, Esquilino hill.
They are supported on this by leftists that rule on this city , and by their major, Walter Veltroni, an ex-communist.
So right parties called police and police closed the building yard, but only for architectural irregularities.
 

The leftist mayors all around italy are trying to build as many mosques as they can.
 

And in many islamic websites you could see banners inciting muslim immigrants to vote left parties.
I am worried about the future of italian culture, muslims (but also chinese and indians) are dangerous meance to our country.