Warning from SIOE

As expected a march like the 9/11 march has attracted organizations and people who intend to hijack our demonstration because it really has been able to unite people in spite of country, political, religious and sociael boundaries.

It has been able to unit people because the demonstration is built up on slogans that everybody can join:

Stop islamisation of Europe.
 
No sharia here.
 
Democracy not theocracy.
 
Enough is enough.
 
In addition we have “Aims and rules” that only allows the official slogans and national flags.
 
All recognitions that one belongs to this or that organization or party is prohibited.
 
These rules were made so that everybody can stand shoulder to shoulder and demonstrate for the only thing that means something now, to stop the Islamisation of Europe.
 
There have been American groups intending to change the whole purpose of the demonstration, another title, another goal, but we have stood firmly because we know that our chosen slogans can unite the Europeans across frontiers.
 
There have been parties who have tried, and still try, to hijack the demonstration for their own purposes.
 
For example we can see that Paul Belien’s attempts to fragment the demonstration iby encouraging people to meet in a certain places in Brussels for a minute’s silence for the victims for 9/11 terrorist attack or even to celbrate his birthday.
 
SIOE alone decides the time, place and whatever is happening because our concern is, and always has been, the safety and security of demonstrators.
 
We actually care about our supporters!
 
Also, it is just this kind of disagreement Thielemans wishes, so we won’t get this beautiful and united demonstration against the Islamisation of Europe.
 
Paul Belien is not licensed organizer for SIOE and thus, whether he means to be or not, is a factor for splitting the stop-Islamisation wave that is building up now.
 
You cannot be against Islamisation and then use it for your own minor purposes.  There is, but one goal – to stop the Islamisation of Europe.
 
Therefore, we now publish a chapter from SIAD’s management handbook.
 
The chapter is called “Warning to leaders”.
 
Because we have to remember that our movement really is a thorn in the eye of these politicians who have invited the Moslems (and thereby Islamist Kilifascists) into Europe, and these same politicians now work on extending the EU to the Islamo-Arab world.
 
The “Euro-Mediterranean” co-operation.
 
Therefore, they’ll do everything in order to break up a movement like ours.
 
Read “Warning to leaders” here.

Warning to leaders

Naturally, people who join politically incorrect groups like ours tend to be somewhat different from the average run-of-the mill herd animal. As an average they are more individiualistic, politically more aware and hold stronger opinions. Probably they are also more intelligent and more courageous. All in all fine people, but not the easiest ones to make walk in step. But the very reason for our forming an organisation is of course to do just that – to work towards a common goal. To do that with such a crowd of individualists is not the easiest thing in the world, and we can only succeed if we concentrate on the one and only goal, that we agree upon. To stop islamisation.
Be sure that your members have other agendas beside this. But they are all different, so they must be kept strictly away from our work. Otherwise the way to dissention and split-up lies wide open.   
The key word is one-pointednes!

Our type of organisation – being underfunded – will almost enevitably suffer from lack of qualified personel. We must rely on volunteers, but that poses other serious problems.
Why?
  
Because some – probably most – volunteers are not very qualified. They have to be taught a great deal before they become of much use.
- And because those few who seem to be qualified must be handled with a great deal of circumspection. Their reason to join us may be one of several. 

<br />
1) The volunteer is genuinely and seriously willing to do his/her share to work to counteract islamization.
2) The volunteer is a plant.
3) The volunteer is one of several kinds of screwball.

1) In the first case you should sing Hosianna – but the problem remains HOW DO YOU DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE THREE CATEGORIES?
That’s where circumspection comes in. 

2) You cannot know if the volunteer is a plant. So you do two things: ALWAYS stay within the limits of the law. If the volunteer is an undercover police officer – well and good: let him/her report back to his/her bosses to his/her heart’s content, and make sure that there is nothing illegal to report!  BUT also make sure that he/she has plenty of work to do! If the government provides us with some unpaid manpower, we might as well use it. An undercover police officer or an enemy plant probably will be more willing to work hard than a bone fide volunteer.
If the person in question tries to induce you to cut legal corners with the full knowledge that it is our policy to stay strictly on the right side of
the law, he/she is probably a plant.

Another thing is of course that we use the need-to-know principle. Our 
tactical plans are not to be divulged prematurely.

3) The third category, the screwball, comes in several varieties and
varieties’ varieties.  Organsations of our kind enevitably act as magnets for people with all sorts of crazy ideas – which they will try to promote inside our organisation, as well as outside it, using its facilities (if any!).
The cure for this is of course to stick strictly to our policy. We are and must remain a single-cause movement. If we allow any other ideas, be they marxist, libertarian, new age, ecologic or what-have-you into our midst we will be dead before we know it. 
Or the screwball may be a power maniac. He/she wants to take over, not necessarily because he has a program of his own, but simply to feel important. He/she spreads discontent and sooner or later he will blow your organisation apart.
When he is disclosed he will try to do that in any case. And a few months later you may find him doing the same in a rival or even an enemy organisation.
People in category three are called narcissist types, I believe. You will almost certainly run into some of them. 

Still others have a political agenda. In our country at least there are
people pretty well trained in spreading discontent and/or worming themselves into influental positions in order to steer the organisation in their direction og to neutralise it. The communists were notorious in that respect.
  

They let some well known and respected person stay on as the chairman and figurehead, while they got themselves into the humble but immensely influental post as the secretary. Here they did all the practical work and made sure that the organisation worked the way they (or rather their masters in Moscow) wanted. 
Remember the peace movements? 
  

The person in question may also be a political (or secret police) plant who works diligently to make sure that your organisation stays quiet and politically harmless. Could your hard working secretary be such a one? Think about it! 
But there are others. I remember a middle aged couple who joined a choir of amateur singers. At first they were well liked and they sang well. But having established themselves they began protesting against some Christian psalms on the choir’s repertoire. That was offensive to their atheist wiewpoints, and they threatened to resign if these psalms were not removed from the repertoire. Luckily the choir’s chairwoman held her ground and let them go.

Such things happen all the time, so watch out