By definition the main enemy cannot be our alien immigrants, partly because some of them are not Moslems – or Islamists – partly because they have been enticed to migrate into Denmark by the Danish authorities, i.e. by the elected politicians, who have lured them into our country with temptingly large transfer incomes.
Not only has it been made possible but also attractive to immigrate to
Denmark thanks to an nasty concord between the Danish elected politicians
(The now defunct political parties “Fælles Kurs”, “Fremskridtspartiet” and later (to some extent) “Dansk Folkeparti” being the only opponents). The fact that some aliens – especially those from Moslem countries – are quite a lot more troublesome than others (mortally dangerous in fact) should not have come as a surprise and particularly not to politicians who have all the expertise in the world at their disposal.
Regrettably, our politicians have not been equal to their task. They did
not know/understand what they were doing, when they enacted that horrible
immigration law of 1983, the law which threw our country open to mass
immigration. If they did know what they were doing they are blacker
scoundrels than I can imagine.
However, in 1986 they were surprisingly ready with their propaganda,
oppression, and allegations of racism against those few who arose in protest.
So maybe there is something wrong with my imagination.
The principal enemies of SIAD are not the immigrants. They can still be
induced to return to their own countries if only the award is big enough.
The prime enemy is our own main body of elected politicians. At long last they acknowledge that the mass immigration will be disastrous to Denmark, unless they succeed in “integrating” the large number of Moslems they have let into our country. They cannot, however, really find out what they mean by “integration”. When asked they will say that “integration” is something to do with immigrants not being a burden or troublesome but, on the contrary, becoming a positive contribution to society.
In other words: the solution to the problem is to solve the problem, which is a true statement but void of meaning. In logic this is known as a tautology.
The politicians maintain that the problems with troublesome aliens must be solved. Which is true. However their suggestions as to how to do so make no sense!
They believe themselves that their words make sense however. And they are aware that unless the immigrants are “integrated” (i.e. if the problems are not solved) then the country is heading for a disaster. It is just that we do not
se any real result of these “integration” efforts – on the contrary!
The politicians forget that another solution exists. A real, albeit unpleasant one. To encourage the Mohammedans to return to their own countries!
This can be done in a number of ways which supplement one another.
1) All attempts to adapt to Islamic rules and norms should cease. No halal slaughtered meat in school lunches for example Schoolchildren will be sowering naked together after phisical excercises. NO transfer incomes to foreigners entering the country.
2) Same rules for Mohammedan mosques in Denmark as those for Christian churches in Saudi Arabia. To show an example, Lene Espersen, Minister of Justice, might start doing her job, i.e. respecting the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmarkt, as the above mentioned examples could be implemented on that basis.
3) Every Mohamedan with a foreign background could be offered a substantial amount of money for each person (man, woman, and child) to leave the country without the possibility of return. (We could afford it, for instance by cuts in the foreign aid. It may seem expensive, but in the long run it would be an immense saving. It would also be both reasonable and just. After all, the Danish people and their elected politicians have induced the foreigners to come.
Of course, this means that immigration from Islamic countries must brought to a halt. We cannot pay some foreigners to leave just to let others in, demanding money to leave again! Some conventions would have to be modified along the way. So be it.
But the politicians cannot – or will not – see the possibilities in such solutions. They are convinced that “integration” (whatever that means!) is possible and necessary in order to avoid chaos and disaster. So they see SIAD’s attempt to fight islamisation as a serious threat to “integration” (whatever that means!) – and thus a threat to themselves and to the country.
Consequently they consider SIAD dangerous, and consequently their subservient press (manned by predominantly leftist and immigration friendly journalists) will try to ignore our existence as much as they dare. And therefore SIAD must view our own politicians as principal dangers to our country’s future.
SIAD has to face harsh reality. The Danish politicians are Denmark’s worst enemies and they regard us in the same way. Therefore we must NEVER give the politicians or their henchmen any excuse to crack down on us. This means that we must ALWAYS act within the law. (But we will gladly announce it whenever the political authorities break it – and they do too!).
This also means that the SIAD people should NEVER resort to violence.
From now on SIAD will be watched – and if possible infiltrated – by the intelligence services and their political masters. Information about time and place of SIAD’s meetings may well be leaked to so-called “antiracists” who are very violent people.
Sadly, such are the conditions.
“It’s a jungle out there!”
P.H.B
We have done some housekeeping to improve the look of the SIAD English weblog site. Despite the changes to this page, it will be business as usual in SIAD.
SIAD has been encouraged to establish a paypal account for funds for the trial against koranic verses. The account is open now. You will find the link on the left sidebar.
When you give or buy things in a Red Cross shop you believe that the surplus goes to help needy people. It does not cross your mind that the shop has made a contract according to which the whole surplus for the next 4-5 years will go to Yemen which for one thing is one of the most female oppressive countries in the whole world.
