Demonstration sep. 11th
Skrevet af siad på marts 4, 2007
“STOP ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE
Demonstration outside the European Parliament
September 11th 2007
Europeans are saying
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
NO SHARIA HERE
So join the call
All European nations must be represented
SO IF YOU LOVE FREEDOM
IF YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY
BE THERE!!”
The organisers of the demonstration are:
SIAD (Denmark) sioe@siad.dk phone: +45 96771784
No Sharia Here (England) sioe.nsh@btinternet.com
We have contact with Akte-islam in Germany who organizes the german participation: http://akte-islam.de/1.html
We seek people/organisation from all other european countries who will organize participation from their own country.
For questions or coordination inbetween the countries contact SIAD or No Sharia Here.
STOP ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE
ORIGINS
Stop Islamification Of Europe (SIOE) is an alliance of people across Europe with the single aim of preventing Islam becoming a dominant political force in Europe.
It originated with the joining of Stop Islamseringen Af Danmark (SIAD) a political party dedicated to stopping the Islamification in Denmark with a loose association of people in England whose rallying cry “No Sharia Here” who want to maintain English law and stop the creeping growth of sharia law in England.
SIOE is growing in Europe with the amalgamation of similarly minded groups.
AIMS
SIOE exists to legally combat the overt and covert expansion of Islam in Europe.
SIOE condemns racism as the lowest form of human stupidity, but considers Islamophobia to be the height of common sense.
SIOE states that Islam and democracy are incompatible due to teachings within the Koran itself and some of the hadiths which comprise sharia law.
SIOE sees that such incompatibility is self-evident when those tenuous democracies in countries where Islam is the dominant religion are scrutinized.
Such “democracies” have only existed in the post European colonial period, since the end of World War Two.
It has always been the case, but also increasingly so, that in Islamic countries, whether “democratic” or not, non-Muslims are at best treated as second class citizens, or at worst oppressed.
SIOE believes this to be due to the teachings of Islam, which encourages Muslims to feel superior to non-Muslims, and that Islam must prevail over any other religion and political system, by any means.
SIOE finds the concept of “moderate” Muslims difficult because of the Islamic practises of Taqiyya and Kitman which are designed to deceive and mislead non-Muslims in order to promote the ascendance of Islam over any other religion and political system.
Therefore, if a political party’s leaders and members may be accused of lying and their policies challenged, then so should a religion’s, especially Islam, which considers lying to be not only acceptable, but obligatory in the furtherance of its doctrine.
Furthermore, SIOE wants all religions to be treated in law the same way as political parties with no special legal protection. This should apply especially to Islam because it is a combined political, legal and judicial system administered and overseen by un-elected theologians, completely contrary to Western concepts of democracy.
This is why democracy is failing in Islamic countries and giving way to Islamic theocracy.
SIOE considers that those Western politicians, journalists, academics and social groups, who support Islam, are deliberately misleading Europeans as to the nature of Islam. This is particularly evident in the non-reporting of Islamist atrocities around the world, but also in the re-writing of history to portray Islam in a favourable light as a non-aggressive religion.
SIOE reflects the attitude of most people in Europe that Islam is being favoured above indigenous European cultures and that Muslims are being selectively protected by politicians and lawyers at the expense of non-Muslims who often find themselves unprotected.
SIOE challenges the funding by Saudi Arabia for the building of mosques and other Islamic institutions in Europe and elsewhere around the world, when that country outlaws religions other than Islam, politics other than Islam and legislature other than Islam. Such asymmetric funding must be stopped.
No more mosques until we see churches in Mecca.
REASONS
TO MAINTAIN OUR HARDFOUGHT DEMOCRACY
“ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!” is the rallying cry of all liberty-loving Europeans who are tired of seeing their values and ways of life eroded.
Arguably, more than any other continent, Europe has suffered most to achieve its present happy condition of liberal democracy.
Centuries of international conflicts and civil wars, most notably of course the two world wars of the 20th century, were endured by the ordinary folk of Europe.
However, conflict, strife and warfare are not the preserve of Europe. The USA suffered its own civil war; China and Russia are still staggering out of the rubble of revolution down the rocky road to democracy.
Out of the centuries of Europe’s internal strife blossomed the Renaissance and Enlightenment, which in turn bore the fruits of democracy.
Freethinking men and women fashioned this fragile, imperfect political system, with its many nuances, which nevertheless survives and grows because of its intrinsic fairness and popularity.
Democracy in turn released those lucky people enjoying its benefits, to form the most medically, scientifically and artistically productive part of the world we call “The West”.
Many of the West’s achievements have come in the period since the Second World War, and its people determinedly defended their hard earned principles of democracy and freedom against the totalitarian doctrine of Communism.
In winning both World War Two and the Cold War, the West defeated two of its greatest enemies, one the European cancer of Nazism, the second the contagion of Communism.
Unfortunately, the existence of both has led to the adoption in modern political parlance of the fatuous terms “left” and “right.”
Even more unfortunately, in Europe at least, “left” has misleadingly come to mean “good” and “right” to mean “bad”.
The table of political oppression is a round one, at which the power-ravenous “right” and “left” sit shoulder-to-shoulder, gnawing the bones of freedom’s cadaver.
Rational people know these truths.
Totalitarianism is the antithesis of liberty.
Theocracy is the antipathy of democracy.
OUR OWN POLITICIANS, POLICE AND JUDGES ARE THE DANGER
So why have rational people allowed irrationality to rule?
It is because the main danger to liberal democracy is its inherent liberalism, which opens itself to being hijacked by self-styled liberals.
A Nazi will punch you for the good of the state. A Communist will kick you for the good of the state. A liberal will do both while shaking your hand and telling you it’s for your own good.
Rational people recognise that the only liberality self-styled “liberals” indulge in, is liberally banning everything they disagree with.
Lamentably, top of the banning agenda is free speech.
Understandably, because of the events of World War Two and also our colonial past, Europeans have become wary of persecuting minority groups.
This has led to Europeans encouraging people from around the world to settle in Europe and to share the benefits of Western ideals.
However, this laudable intention has been usurped, not only by some of the groups of people coming to Europe, but worse still by self-loathing, guilt-laden politicians not only of the “liberal” persuasion, but also capitalist free-marketeers.
Such people have inculcated themselves into positions of power.
Together, they undermine our ways of life, stifle dissent from their diktats and spread feelings of political remoteness and hopelessness among the majority of European people.
This is exactly the kind of totalitarianism we fought against in World War Two and the Cold War.
SO WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE?
So what is different about the present battle (some describe it as a war)?
This time around the struggle is against a theocratic totalitarianism called Islam.
The very fact that it is a theocracy, in other words a religion, protects Islam from being challenged.
Political constitutions (written or otherwise) across the West enshrine the principle of freedom to religious practise.
Therefore, religions may not be attacked in the same way as political parties.
In the West, politicians and their parties come under continuous verbal and written onslaughts in the media regarding their policies, performance and personnel.
Religious practise, however, is protected.
Despite this, Christianity, Europe’s main religion, has constantly been ridiculed, criticised and condemned, more often than not with impunity.
This is because Christianity is an easy target, mainly due to the fact that calling for Christian heretics to be killed is deemed more than unacceptable by Christian clergy, and actually killing heretics contravenes laws drawn up by democratically elected legislators.
Certainly leaving Christianity, or any other religion besides Islam, does not merit any punishment, in this world at least.
As we all know, this is not the case with Islam’s sharia law, which stipulates a death sentence for apostates leaving Islam for any reason.
Until recently, religion has been put in its place in Western society. It has become a matter of one’s own personal belief and private conscience.
For generations, offending a religious person has not been regarded as being more than bad manners. One of the fundamental benefits in the West is the right to offend and be offended.
Religion has not been a threat to society and the clergy has not formulated legislation in the West, although it has been allowed to lobby the various elected governments.
All this is changing due to the imposition of Islam.
No other religion demands more from those who do not adhere to its doctrine.
This would not be a problem in the West, if our leaders actually stood up for Western values and insisted that Muslims live within our laws and accepted our cultures and social systems.
Instead, it is we who are told we must abandon our values, cultures and societies in order not to offend Muslims. It is Islam that is being rammed down our throats and the throats of our children.
It is not only in the West that Islam is causing misery and mayhem. All around the world Islam is battling the “infidels”.
In response all our politicians, journalists, social commentators and religious leaders do is avoid mentioning the murderous activities in places like Indonesia, Thailand and sub-Saharan Africa. However, if an Israeli soldiers so much as farts within earshot of a Palestinian mosque the whole world knows about it within minutes and politicians resoundingly condemn Israel.
Such sanctimonious, selective conscience is contemptible and Europeans are fed up with being oppressed for the sake of what most believe to be the most corrosive and intolerant political system ever devised.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
shiva sagde
Great work
I am passing the link to other sites and bloggers
All the best
SHIVA
Diva sagde
Why september?
Isnt that a bit late for that?
tabuka sagde
Really a good idea –
Hope for support and success
SIOE England sagde
Why September? Well 9/11 is the intended date for obvious reasons and this gives us time to coordinate a pan Europe rally. It isn’t just a matter of turning up, behind the scenes coordination has to be arranged.
We also would like to do a 7/7 rally in London, maybe in Regents Park.
We need people to commit to going to Brussels and not just say it’s a good idea. When we have some idea of numbers we can think about doing the 7/7 rally.
tabuka sagde
http://www.politicallyincorrect.de foreslår at der i de europæiske lande omdeles flyveblade, f.eks. på cafeer og lign. steder, der gør opmærksom på arrangementet.
lastcha sagde
French + swiss sites relays : http://www.bafweb.com/2007/03/08/11-septembre-2007-un-appel-a-manifester-au-niveau-europeen-contre-lislamisation/
Regular updates okay.
Please keep informed of your action (if you have a mailing list)
fouesnant@gmail.com [910 member]
voxgalliae@yahoo.fr
contact@france-echos.com
fdesouche@gmail.com
ajm@ajm.ch
redaction@bafweb.com
SIOE England sagde
This looks like it is spreading outside Europe. People in the USA could easily organise rallies in their state capitals on 9/11.
USA = SIOUSA.
Australia = SIOOZ.
Let’s unite and stop Islamification Of The West = SIOTW
No sharia Here
Fang sagde
Good luck from OZ!
SIOE England sagde
Cheers Fang. How about getting a demo in Oz on the same day? If you can get the message out about SIOE in Oz then we can make it world wide. If it isn’t feasible to get to CAnberra then people can rally outside their state capital buildings.
No sharia Here
SIOE England sagde
Can you put the 9/11 Brussels demo up on your blog Fang?
Charles sagde
good idea, France is from your side!
No islamism in Europe!
USpace sagde
Keep up the good work, we will keep spreading the word. Go SIAD! Go Denmark!
absurd thought -
God of the Universe
wants Taliban Earth
that’s what liberals want too
destroy all human rights
.
Red sagde
The essay below was originally written for readers outside the west in response to the efforts at SOAD/SIOE.
Some things are stirring in Europe to the question: What to do with Islam?
The philosophical basis to countermand Islam is available. The arguments also exist and the rationale is solid. Islam, through the Quran and the Sunnah, is doctrinally aggressive, invasive, war-like, and especially imperialistic in a religious and a nationalist sense.
It is especially imperialistic because it opens the route for Islamic countries to interfere in the affairs of another country on behalf of a small or a minority Muslim population. (This parallels the promotion of the western agenda that lectures and sometimes imposes sanctions on other countries, especially non-democratic ones, if they do not uphold the liberal ideology (human rights being an example).
On the point of Islam, few nations will challenge Saudi Arabia to open its country to churches and Buddhist temples, but Turkey readily summons the Danish ambassador over a call to ban mosques from Denmark. Malaysia will give special dispensations to Muslims immigrants from Indonesia and Burma, but will do nothing to help Thai Buddhists fleeing Muslims killing the latter in southern Thailand. Islamic countries, when they violate national sovereignty, have borrowed well from the western liberalism: they say their religion transcends ethnicity and nations.
In spite of the march of Islam, the Quran and Sunnah are also highly vulnerable to criticism once they are tabled next to liberal ideology, both as a political and a value system. This vulnerability has now been exploited in Europe and best encapsulated in the page: Stop Islamification of Denmark (SIAD). It wants to take the same agenda to all of Christian or secular Europe.
Central to its raison d’etre is that nations once independent of Islam remained entitled to deal with the “religion” as it sees fit. That is, this is a national, sovereign issue. This approach has by far the most credible tools and has the clearest and most concrete answers to the question: What to do with Islam?
Answer No 1: The Legal Path
The principal idea is that Islam, whether practiced by moderates or otherwise, is fundamentally antithetical to existing civil and constitutional laws in Europe. If this were so, then the fundamentals of Islam – as spelled out in the Quran and Sunnah – are subject to judicial review. Judicial review (although a norm in America) is uncommon in Europe but it brings to the fore, indeed the possibility that Islam, in parts or in totality, is illegal, unlawful or both.
Example of judicial review: SIAD is challenging specific chapters and verses of the Quran and Sunnah that violates two existing constitutional provisions in Denmark.
This is a innovative approach in that it not only draws attention to the illegality found in Islam per se, the review pushes the envelope to take action thereafter. Stop Islamification of Denmark says that if Islam violates the Danish constitution, then it is incumbent on the state to ban all the mosques.
This, of course, has its problems, chief of which is the human rights provision that guarantees freedom of conscience, the backhanded way of saying freedom of religion or no-religion. Europe now realises, even if belatedly, that the human rights that they made as doctrinal dogma is now the same cause of its own afflictions from an invasive Islam.
Answer No. 2: The Political Path
Islam is, among other things, also politics. But the delusion of the west in believing that church and state are or can be separable is one reason for European ineptness in dealing with Islam. The answer then is to press for legislations that will change the status of religion, especially Islam, into a body-politic.
This is to say that Islam, in particular, must be made answerable to rules governing, say, the conduct of politics and especially to rules for the conduct of a society. It is akin to treating it like a chamber or civil society or especially as a political party. Once legislated, Islam will be taken for its word. Its “religious” text like that of the charter of a political society is subject to scrutiny and its members subject to restrictions, according to law. It is not enough that Islam, like other religions, has no special place outside of politics or the state, it must be legislated to ensure that the objective of separation is achieved.
Example of political review: By marching to Brussels on Sep 11 2007, Stop Islamification of Europe (SIOE), an offshoot of Stop Islamification of Denmark (SIAD), is making a clear political statement, and this is contained in the following:
SIOE wants all religions to be treated in law the same way as political parties with no special legal protection. This should apply especially to Islam because it is a combined political, legal and judicial system administered and overseen by un-elected theologians, completely contrary to Western concepts of democracy.
Answer No 3: The Sovereign Path
Islam is insidious in violating the sovereignty of a nation not only because it puts the state secondary or subservient to a higher law, that is Islam, but it also opens the channel for “Islamic countries” to intervene on behalf of a local minority Muslim population. Building mosques, funded by Arabs, is a demonstrable example. Intervening on behalf of an armed Muslim group fighting its national government is another.
The demand for the return of sovereignty is not about giving the state even more powers than that it has in its possession. But it is to compliment the powers of the state on the ground, in the villages and homes, all of which are farthest from central control. This is where government powers are weakest in dealing with Islam. A second reason to grant additional powers to the grassroots rather than central authority in combating Islam is this: Politicians who seized the instruments of power but are sympathetic or fearful of Islam can easily redirect the purpose of the state to serve Islam or the minority, immigrant group.
At an international level there is one problem if individual European nations now demand to retake their sovereign independence. They must reciprocate on the same principle. If in Islamic countries they stone their Muslim women, then it is oblige to say nothing, do nothing: it is none of your business. They will have to keep their western liberal dogma to themselves.
Hence, sovereignty is embedded in the precept that an independent nation is entitled to deal with a foreign institution, such as Islam, as it sees fit. For this purpose, local jurisdictions, at village and county levels are most effective because Islam, before it wriggles its way to the centres of power, thrive in such places.
A third and serious problem to this approach is this: Local jurisdictions are fearful or indifferent to dealing with religion. This has arisen from decades of constant harangue that religious equality, as the flipside of political, social and economic, are desirable and possible.
This notion of leaving faith at the door of the church and temple is so blatantly irrational and unrealistic, few people challenges the assumption. It assumes that faith and the Self are separable, like material things. It assumes all faiths are about individual salvation, a route to heaven. It assumes all people have faiths and all faiths are the same in essence. Confucius was right, 2,000 years before these assumptions have now dawn on Europe: Respect the gods but keep your distance.
The consequence of the western fallacy has been that Islam has so far been treated, in power centres, with velvet gloves and so shielded from criticisms.
But once western countries treat Islam like it is any sphere of daily life, it then removes the centrality of religion’s hold on its peoples and the nation. It changes the paradigm because, after all, imams do not just preach God. They also speak of jihad, conversion, annihilation, women, infidels and apostates. This is stuff of politics. They affect the sanctity of existing and prevailing civilisation so that such a religion should therefore be placed under independent and national jurisdictions. The imams and their religion must be held accountable.
Example of sovereign power: There is yet to be any. Some countries have a ministry for regulating religion. Westerners won’t even touch it. Now, they better so that one of the first items in stopping Islamisation is the creation of a ministry/department of religion or of civil affairs or of local affairs. Islam is at the top of the department’s agenda and it is charged not with promotion thereof but with regulation. Muslims do not sit as director-general; such a person may offer advice. In all conflicting situations, Islam must yield not the local culture, as provided for in constitutional provisions. At local levels, the department must have the final say in any thing remotely connected to religion, Islam in particular.
Endnote:
The March on Brussels on Sep 11 is the beginning of a European demand at grassroots to retake national sovereignty. This may be a flash-in-the-pan, for one reason: the Europeans have yet to hone in on its reasons for doing so. Stopping Islamisation is not improbable except that the dilemma is not remove: How can Europe empty itself of Islam without violating its own value systems of equal and human rights? The obvious answer says that those rights were either a fallacy or they were deeply circumscribed to apply only to citizenship and/or to law. Even the latter is a problem
Restatement of its raison d’etre is necessary because Europe, by stopping Islamisation, is redefining terms originally set out 40 or 50 years ago on the rights of civil society and the charter for human rights. It is self-immolation to go about putting straightjackets on Islam and then say those activities are in observation of the rights, as they are presently defined. An international congress a few days before the march should rewrite the principles that western societies have so arrogantly lectured the world. This, not the march, will be the momentous event in western history.
In short, to answer the question about what to do with Islam, Europe must first answer the problem it created for itself and beyond: Are all humans equal?
Xaragma sagde
I picked it up & posted it in a few FidoNet echoes before I read the comments…
Stop Islamification Of Europe
September 11 might be a good time for free people everywhere to show their rejection
of Sharia Law, Islamification, and those who seek to impose it.
No to Sharia in Oz
Fang sagde
I have your blog on my blog roll. Yes I will put this up!:)
Anthony Backhouse sagde
i have tried to contact ‘No Sharia here’ without success. is there anything you can do to put me in contact with them?
VERONICA JORDAN sagde
Fantastic news, We must all unite on this one it’s far too important not to, The news will spread now around each country i am contacting bloggers known to me personally also friends and family.
Time to be counted has arrived!
SIOE England sagde
Anthony Backhouse – please try again to contact nsh as there is no record of your attempt.
No Sharia Here
Martin sagde
Huray for SIAD! Keep up the good work folks!
JoC sagde
I have sent a copy of the demo flyer to Vlaams Belang, the popular Flemish political party opposed to the islamification of Belgium/Europe. You may like to contact them too – info@vlaamsbelang.org
Being on the spot the VB should be able to mobilise large numbers of members and sympathisers.
Is it certain the European Parliament will be in Brussels and not Strasbourg in September? The way it moves backwards and forwards (wasting millions each time) is just one more reason the EU needs to be seriously reformed (or dissolved.)
JoC
London
SIOE England sagde
JoC – the EU Commission is in Brussels. We had already thought about your question when deciding on having the march, and decided Brussels was to be the venue regardless of where the EU Parliament was being held.
The Commission is the decison-making organisation anyway.
maxthemillion sagde
ISRAEL IS OUR REAL FRIEND, stop hating them to appease islam!all this times you and me in the western world have pointed fingers at a small piece of land which is less then half the size of switzerland, why? dont these people the jews who europe seeked to destroy falsley thinking they a danger, its only right they have the land of their ancestors, and besides their has been jews living there for the last two thousand years, we cant abandon our true friends in favour of false and deceitful ones, its the brave young men and women of the IDF who stand against the true evil face of islam, children and women being turned into martyrs with suicide bombs, and being urged on too throw stones, if you/we continue to vent our anger and hatred on the jews we will overlook the real problem, the rape of our beautiful europe which will become (Eurabia)and who will we blame then ourselves???
sylvia mccosker sagde
This sounds interesting (by the way: my mother’s mother’s father’s parents, Nils and Maren Larsen, migrated to Australia from Denmark in 1867). I have a suggestion. Using either the Muslim handbook “Reliance of the Traveller” or Joseph Schacht’s “Introduction to Islamic Law”, shouldn’t it be possible to create, say, a two-page leaflet summarising in simple language some of the worst aspects of shari’a (e.g cutting off hands of thieves, killing of apostates, women’s testimony worth half that of a man’s, testimony of a non-Muslim not accepted against the word of a Muslim, …you get the idea? – and a list of all those Islamised countries that currently practise some or all of these rules!). Another leaflet could set out Muslim Rules for Dhimmis – e.g., a translation in full of the Pact of Omar, with all the vile stuff about no ringing of church bells, not being allowed to ride a horse, no right to bear arms, no right to criticise Islam, no right to call for help, no right to self-defence against a Muslim, etc. Most people hear the word ’sharia’ and equate it with, say, canon law or Jewish observance, or hear rubbish about Golden Andalusia and Muslim Tolerance – they don’t know that for those it ‘protects’, Islam runs like the mafia, ‘put up, pay up, shut up – or we kill you’. My colloquial translation of jizya – ‘your money or your life’. At the demonstrations, hand out leaflets – ’sharia explained’ ‘what Islam does to Muslims who leave Islam’ (list of murdered apostates and ‘blasphemers’ from various places…a L.O.N.G list). Make a list of all the churches Muslims burned last year and all the music shops, schools and bookshops they blew up. Make sure everything is properly referenced and verifiable – this is not propaganda, this is facts piled upon facts. Tack up posters with anti-sharia ‘95 theses’ on university and community noticeboards. Publish the Hamas Charter and the original PLO Charter so people can see how breathtakingly violent – and mendacious – they are. Good luck. If someone organised a demonstration of this kind in MY hometown, I’d go to it.
jibraltar espagnol sagde
¿Degolladeros de los Cristianos en Europa? ¡Nunca más!
SpitzeMondsichel (from Berlin) sagde
For german speakers we have a FORUM ESPECIALLY FOR THE DEMONSTRATION and all the QUESTIONS AROUND this topic.
Please, come and join
: http://www.islamwatch.de/forum
Let´s get more connected….
Pleas,e post in our forum all YOUR LINKS to all the OTHER FORUMS around the DEMONSTRATION – especially those for german- and englisch-speakers.
BUT most of all, we need an INFO-WEBSITE with brief FACTS about the DEMONSTRATION to INVITE EVERYBODY and EVERYWHERE.
This Info-Website should GIVE all VISITORS a CLEAR ANSWER to the following QUESTIONS:
What?
When?
Where?
Who are the organisators? Or (Which partys? Which citizens’ initiatives? Which prominent islam critics?)
Who are the speakers?
What´s the programm? (what? when? where? After-Demo-Entertainment? Bands? Music?)
How many people will come (estimated)?
Why? (Against what? But also: What for? What´s the aim?)
…all the practical details can still wait, untill the details are fixed. But we shoud start with the invitation campagn right now (we only have 90 days or 3 months left – not much time for a large demonstration…)
However.. These INFORMATIONS on an WELL-STYLED WEBSITE will be a BOOSTER for the NUMBER of PARTICIPANTS.
The only thing, that really matters is the number of participants ! ! !
The more people will join us, the more powerfull the message will be.
We really need such a info website to SPREAD the INFORMATION and the LINKS just EVERYWHERE:
- in all the islam-critizising WEBLOGS,
- by comments in online-magazines, newspapers and related weblogs
- in all these FORUMS (e.g. by using the signature-function…)
- on youtube.com, on googlevideo, on sevenload.com, flickr.com…
… JUST EVERYWHERE ! ! !
And the Mainstream-media will follow! But we must START and LEAD the campaign. And than media will follow.
e.g. here is an information (in german) about the demonstration: http://www.zukunft-ch.ch/pages/themen_islam.php?bid=26
That´s a nice support! But if you follow the link to http://www.akte-islam.de/8.html (U. Ulfkotte – PAX EUROPE) sadly you won´t find much more information there.
I emailed Mr. Ulfkotte and he said, that right now he is working out everything with the officials in Brussels… and he can not say much more right now, except the fact, that it is a lot of work… (i can really imagine this…
)
But please, if you from “SIAD” know something more – please let us know.
Maybe it is possible to start an information-website at first in “beta-style” which will be updated every day.
Or in BLOG-Style, where somebody of SIAD or somebody from the network writes a short message about the stand of preparation of the Demonstration.
Let´s create such a website and spread the link everywhere to invite ALL of EUROPE.
Just imagine:
If only 0,01 percent of the 500 million Europeans will join us, we will have 50.000 of active participants in Brussels
If only 0,1 percent of the 500 million Europeans will join us, we will have 500.000 (half a million) of participants
If only 1 percent of the 500 million Europeans will join us, we will have 5 millions of participants.
I think 0,01 percent must be the basis. If the whole network of islam critics works together, spread the message everywhere and invites as many people as possible – than we should get much more than 0,01 percent of the Europeans.
What about 100.000? 200.000?
That would be a strong message against islamization and against sharia!
SO LET`S CREATE THIS INFO-WEBSITE AND SPREAD THE INFO AND THE LINKS AOUT THE DEMONSTRATION EVERYWHERE TO INVITE ALL OF EUROPE.
SpitzeMondsichel (from Berlin) sagde
I will spread the link to this page untill the information website is running.
Could you please add the word “Brussels” to the first sentence?
So that at first glance everybody understands that the Demo will be in Brussels and not in Strassbourg or some where else…
thanx!
SpitzeMondsichel (from Berlin) sagde
here are some more detailed infos to the demo:
http://sioe.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/brussels-demo-update/
Do you have contact to East-Europeans who will support or/and join the party? eh i mean Demo
Please, share the LINKS!
First video promoting of the demonstrantion:
“EUROPE UNDER THE HAMMER”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESTXD3WtG0E
2 Threads of 2 german islam-critical Forums speaking about preparation for demonstration (travelgroups, carpool…):
http://islam-deutschland.info/forum/viewtopic.php?p=24093&sid=f5b8e8f779b05cdf5471dbd4499c2bd6
http://www.gruene-pest.de/showthread.php?s=eb2d51a5e96fec4f009fff0c83699dbe&t=238580
Die spitze Mondsichel
the sharp crescent
USpace sagde
Go SIAD and SIOE!
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
never confront Islamists
just let them push you around
change your culture to fit them
.
anotherkaffir sagde
Brilliant, fantastic news can you post on how much attention and support you are receiving. Lets wake the rest of the world up about the lies of this cult. Lets get the message to our politicians.
WILLIAMS sagde
In a nut shell Islam is about world dommination! this is a short and brief view of how the muslims intend to attain their agenda and what is their motivation.The muslims ummah propgates expnasion of islam by all means ,First and fore most by the sword ,it is the duty of all the muslims to kill the non muslims it written. the koran state that there is no other god other than Allah and Mohammed is only true porphet,any one who beg’s to differ is a infidel and kafir so should be beheaded at once.It is said not to be friend them (the non muslims)! strike them when you get the chance..Any peace treaty with the muslims is invalid, as the koran say make peace treaty with the infedals, in the dead of the night go out kill them all . Eevery muslim no matter how he or she is educated in western value ’s DO NOT FOLLOW MULTICULTURE ethics it is evident in the way they dress, they live.It is a mere obligation that muslims pretend that they follows the law of the land(this is allowed in islam-to be decitfull) when they are minority.If they become tha majority the rules of engagment diffrent,Remember(jessiya the slave tax which give’s the non beliver right to live in muslim dominated country,persecution are many in islam yet it called the universal brother hood ) & who ever disagrees has to be beheaded.Polygamy is rampant in islam have any one every wondred why? the point is women in islam are sub-human without any rigths on their own ,they are only useful to reproduce their own, It is because polygamy leads to a lot of children .They breed like rabbits,And without firing a single short one day in the near future (may be in another 50-75 years) the muslims will over run Europe by sheer numbers,this also a method of jihad, Might sound LIke conspiracy theory,?Here comes answer as the muslims immigrant from pakistan,libya,morroco and the north afircan belt,middle east & sub continent come to Europe with their peace full brotherhood they slowly change demograph of europe, as of now.,(More than 53 million Muslims live in Europe — 14 million of them in the European Union and growing.) in Europe. A Europe which dose not belive in any thing now(GOD, FAMILY VALUES,IDEOLOGY or,IDENTY). ,because of their hypocriscy of being politically correct or because,widely held libral secular views or simply the will to act,The european’s way of life will cease to exist as we know it now . thank to our Muslim appeasing politicians who are olny intrested in there votes,to hold on to power,These hypocrites look the other way when EUROPEAN WOMEN ARE GANGE RAPED,AND HUMILIATED , by these peace loving Muslims, their aim is ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE. This is what happened in Egypt almost 1300 yrs ago the culture which we admire so much,is now confined to the pages of histoy thanks to islam and his prophet.The muslims from the arab heart land populated Egypt the native’s of this once ancient land became a minorty in their own land,Persecuted and heavily taxed and they vanished without a trace in less than 100 years .And yes the koran advocates this to be a form of jihad…………………..ethnic cleansing i would say!…They claim islam to a religion of peace!.i see europe going the same way ………..not far behind is America .it not to late…………….sit up and smell the coffee!.let us still not say that Islam is peacefull…it time the World ( the people, politicians& media) strat acting today tomorrow migth be too late for who ever who is not a muslim
regards
S.G.W