The quoran contrary to the Danish Constitution

Den Danske Grundlov af 1849

Letter recently send by SIAD to the minister of justice in Denmark:

Dear Lene Espersen

On February 20, 2007 SIAD reported the Quoran to be contrary to the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark Act, sections 67 and 69, and claimed the mosques to be prohibited according to section 78 (2) of the said Act, due to the fact that passages of the Qouran are being read aloud which urge to infringement of the Act of the Constitution including violence and threat of violence.

On March 3, 2007 we received a reply from the Ministry of Justice stating the following:

According the opinion of the Ministry of Justice  there are no grounds for trying to dissolve associations which profess the Qouran, nor are there grounds for trying to prohibit the Qouran in Denmark.

However, we noticed in the reply from Louise Vadheim Mortensen that we should have asked for a prohibition of some of the Qouran verses.  This is certainly not correct. We do not ask for – we demand!

It seemed peculiar to me that it was possible for the Ministry of Justice to send their reply in the above matter already after 14 days, especially when taking into consideration that the Ministry of Justice have received several claims from SIAD going back to June 2006 concerning the ban of our demonstrations in the ghettoes, claims to which we have got no reply so far.

But it seems even more peculiar that it has been possible for the Ministry of Justice within 14 days to examine the Qouran in order to see what passages may be contrary to Danish custom , i.e. everything that makes a difference between  believers and non-believers, between men and women, and all the details in the passages urging to torture of people of another opinion and urging to terrorism.

Consequently, I called the officer attending to the case, Louise Vadheim Mortensen. Her answer to my question whether she had read the Qouran was no. Her answer to my question whether she had read the hadith was that she did not know what it was, but that she wanted to stick to her letter to me anyway.  

Therefore, the conclusion must be the following: This refusal must be either 100% due to political correctness, as the officer has not even squinted at the Qouran at the same time stating that they cannot suppress passages of it. Or the Ministry is afraid to start another muhammed crisis. Another possibility could be that the Ministry feels like Bertel Haarder, Minister of Education, who has declared that he exercises self –censorship in order that he shall not be forced to live under police protection.

However, we still persist in keeping to Section 67 of the Danish Constitution Act and demand that all Qouran verses contrary to Danish customs and thus against Danish law be suppressed.  Section 69 states how to solve the matter stating that conditions and regulations of religious communities diverging from the established church in Denmark must be prescribed by law. And we repeat that we demand a prohibition of meetings in mosques which lecture from a book urging to violence and instigating violence. Such events are contrary to the rules laid down in Section 78(2) of the Danish Constitution Act prescribing that “associations which act by violence or try to reach their goals by violence, instigate violence, or commit similar punishable influence on persons of different opinions, will be dissolved by statutory intervention. The fact that the Qouran encourages people to live their lives like the prophet Muhammed brings the hadith into the picture. Also the hadith must be banned, as the Qouran and the hadith are inseparable.

On the basis of the above mentioned incompetent case work the Minister of Justice must now take action herself  as we insist on a prohibition of Qouran verses contrary to the Danish Constitution Act, as well as a prohibition of meetings in mosques where passages are read aloud thus urging to violence and threats of violence.

We expect a total examination of the Qouran and of the hadith to be the basis of your case work.

It should also be mentioned that having examined and analysed the Qouran and the hadith, and recent talks with terrorists, the American Defence Department at Pentagon have concluded that certain Qouran verses form basis for Islamic terrorism.

Yours faithfully,

Anders Gravers
President of SIAD in
Denmark

The newest blog on the block.

 Well, at least for the moment!

 http://sioe.wordpress.com/

What would Denmark do if there were 62,000 rebels?

The police needs reinforcement from near and far because of about 2,000 rebels. What would Denmark do if there were 62,000 rebels?

         

Jihad-warriors with stones             Denmark? Or Beirut or Paris?  

With 620,000 muslims in Denmark this could just as well bring about a situation in the country where about 10% of these individuals would either feel that they were strong enough, or that they were so unsatisfied with Danish foreign policy and/or Danish immigration policy that they would go into the streets to demonstrate. Here you can see how they reacted on a peacefull demonstration, we just waved with the danish flag!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT_HhT2AmAI

We cannot blame these persons for feeling strong enough as we have all experienced the powerlessness of the police in front of a poor number of 2,000 young demonstrators with upper arms so thin as their wrists!

What would the police do if confronted with 62,000 physically well-trained jihad warriors to whom death is a direct passage to the heaven of Allah, as long as their war is against the unbelievers? Not even the military would be able to help due to the reduction of the Danish defence budget effected by our trators since the cold war, who also reduced the military service to rediculous 6 months.

Nobody shall tell us after some clash to come that we had not been warned.

Mary overrules the right of the Danish people to demonstrate

 On March 6, crown princess Mary visited the habitation area, Gellerup in Århus, as a friendly gesture to the inhabitants. This visit can only be seen as a recognition of the area and an approval of the undemocratic policy pursued there for some time.  Just watch the ryat-like behavior on a peaceful SIAD-demonstration in the area last year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT_HhT2AmAI

Instead of recognizing the inhabitants of the area she should have demanded the Danish Constitution Act be respected also within the ghettoes, e.g. that harmless organizations and political parties be allowed to demonstrate. Not until this requirement has been fulfilled should she set her foot in that area. Among other things SIAD endeavours to ensure that the children and grandchildren of the crown princess shall still be able to accede to the Throne in Denmark. However, this can be difficult to ensure if as a representative of the Danish royal family she sets herself against this goal by a kind of quality-marking the ghettoes with her friendship visit.

Demonstration sep. 11th

“STOP ISLAMIFICATION OF EUROPE

Demonstration outside the European Parliament

September 11th 2007

Europeans are saying

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

NO SHARIA HERE

So join the call

All European nations must be represented

SO IF YOU LOVE FREEDOM

IF YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY

BE THERE!!”

The organisers of the demonstration are:

SIAD (Denmark) sioe@siad.dk   phone: +45  96771784

No Sharia Here (England) sioe.nsh@btinternet.com

We have contact with Akte-islam in Germany who organizes the german participation: http://akte-islam.de/1.html

We seek people/organisation from all other european countries who will organize participation from their own country.

For questions or coordination inbetween the countries contact SIAD or No Sharia Here.

Danish ambassador has been called to account by Turkish newspaper

 Kim Jørgensen, Danish ambassador in Turkey, dissociates himself from the Danish Act of the Constitution by stating that the Danish government should certainly never allow parts of the Qur’an to be suppressed.

Excerpts of the ambassador’s answer to the newspapers:

Asked about a recent controversy on some verses of the Qur’an and an organization that is demanding that mosques be shut down, the ambassador says this has absolutely nothing to do with the Danish government. “It is a very small organization, unknown to the vast majority of Danes. The present case should primarily be seen as a provocation. The mere fact that the chairman of the association, Anders Gravers, sent copies of the complaint to Al-Jazeera TV and to the embassies of Muslim countries in Denmark shows that,” says the ambassador.
However, Kim Jørgensen is only a public officer who has to act upon the instructions he has been given. No matter what opinion the present government might have about SIAD’s complaint against the Qur’an they shall have to take it seriously. In case the Minister of Justice should reject our
demand we intend to take legal action and, if necessary, make a worldwide collection to cover the legal costs. Kim Jørgensen considers our complaint of the violation of the Act of the Constitution a provocation. So it is, but only in a juridical sense, and it is done in order to reveal the truth, to intensify the revelation of the truth.

Our intention is to reveal the truth and consequently we forward the English translations of our complaint against the Qur’an to all English speaking Arabian newspapers i.e. in Saudi Arabia, Palestine, Syria, etc.

Please note: We have noticed that the Turkish newspapers write that articles 67 and 69 of the Qur’an should be a violation of the Danish Act of the Constitution. This is completely wrong. Articles 67 and 69 of the Danish Act of the Constitution must make sure that certain articles of the Qur’an that violate the Danish Act of the Constitution are suppressed.

Turkish newspaper in english about SIAD:http://english.sabah.com.tr/D540C2BA26AC4BFE8632B30B940EE75E.html

 One of the best blogs in the world about islam mention SIAD:

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2007/02/denmark-model.html

The ambassador’s answer to the Turkish newspaper about SIAD:

Asked about a recent controversy on some verses of the Qur’an and an organization that is demanding that mosques be shut down, the ambassador says this has absolutely nothing to do with the Danish government. “It is a very small organization, unknown to the vast majority of Danes. The present case should primarily be seen as a provocation. The mere fact that the chairman of the association, Anders Gravers, sent copies of the complaint to Al-Jazeera TV and to the embassies of Muslim countries in Denmark shows that,” says the ambassador.
The ambassador is very clear on Denmark’s official position: “Denmark is currently making very great efforts to explain what we stand for and what Denmark does not stand for. The Danish government’s position is clear. We believe in respect between religions. Denmark respects Islam and will, naturally, not contribute to disparaging or insulting neither Muslims nor their religion.”  In any case, he does not want to be a part of these discussions at all because he believes that commenting on these provocations would mean allowing any provocation to assume foreign policy dimensions. “I distance myself from such a development, and I will not take part in it. There will be new provocations every day. First, in one place, then in another. First, from one country, and then from another. We must not allow these provocations to derail our relations with the Muslim world,” says Ambassador Jorgensen.