Stop Islamiseringen af Danmark

Archive for februar 2007

SIAD in a turkish newspaper

Skrevet af siad på februar 25, 2007

Anders Gravers was interviewed by a turkish journalist from the paper Hürriyet. It resulted in an article the 24th of feb. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/dunya/6011742.asp?m=1&gid=112&srid=3429&oid=8

We are working on a translation but here we give a short briefing of the interview:

The journalist asked which parts of the koran who offend the danish constitution. We answered sura 8 and 9, especially 9,5, and sura 4,34, sura 4,15, sura 33,60, sura 4,11, sura 2,282, sura 24,13, sura 9,3, sura 12,29, sura 48,17, sura 47,36, sura 76,5, sura 4,57, sura 33,27. And 33,21 who involves the hadith.

To the question about which translation we have used, we answered the german version, which is more true to the arabic version than the danish.

The journalist had seen in a danish newspaper, Politiken, that we have send our claim to the head of the danish justicedepartment, Lene Espersen. But we have also send it to Al Jazeera and a couple of arabic embassies. He wanted to know why we had send it to Al Jazeera and the embassies. Anders Gravers answered that we want to safe the danish imams from another travel to the arabic countries. Instead of travelling around, they could just as well hear the truth from their own channel Al Jazeera and from their embassies.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 10 kommentarer »

The criminal parts of the Koran

Skrevet af siad på februar 22, 2007

It seemed that the mainstream media in Denmark would not release our press release. But one newspaper has just defied the fear(!) and made an article (in danish): http://politiken.dk/indland/article251308.ece

We have send it to Al Jazeera, and we will try to get in touch with the foreign medias. Maybe they are not  so reluctant as the danish, who definately are afraid of making another Muhammed crisis.

   Anders Gravers, the leader of SIAD 

The danish party, SIAD, demands parts of the Koran forbidden in Denmark in accordance with the Danish Constitution

SIAD hereby draws attention to the fact that the Koran is in violation of the Danish Constitution’s paragraphs 67 and 69. SIAD further claims that mosques should be forbidden in consonance with paragraph 78, clause 2.  SIAD also demands that all koran verses incompatible with Danish customs and traditional values should be banned in accordance with the DanishConstitution’s paragraphs 67 and 69, which states that “Citizens have theright to form communities with a view to practising religion in accordance with their faith, but on condition that nothing is taught or done that is at odds with morality or public order”. Paragraph 69 explains this injunction in more detail.  “The status of religious communities outside the Danish Folkekirke shall be specified by law”.  

We also demand that the Minister of Justice apply paragraph 78, clause 2 of the Danish constitution, which states that “societies using violence or seeking to achieve their ends with violence, fomentation of violence or other unlawful pressure on those of a different opinion, shall by dissolved by law”. According to paragraph 78 clause 2 this automatically includes every mosque in so far as those parts of the koran in inciting to violence, murder or threats to people of different opinions are read out there.

SIAD has previously demanded a  prohibition of the koran in 2005, but this time we demand it in accordance with the Danish Constitution, which the minister of justice has sworn to uphold. SIAD, Stop the islamification of Denmark

For contact: Anders Gravers

Tlf: +45 96771784  mobile: +45 61916026

e-mail: kontakt@siad.dk

www.siad.dk

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 33 kommentarer »

620.000 muslims in Denmark

Skrevet af siad på februar 22, 2007


Denmark, the country of the Danes. 
According to Germanic language usage  a “mark” is a remote place or a border area. For one thing, the word is known from the German speaking Austria as the landscape “Steiermark”, so briefly and to the point, Denmark means the area of the Danes. However, the area which was earlier under the Danish Crown was much bigger, and for a long period it also comprised German and Slavonic speaking  people as well as other Scandinavians living at that time in present Germany, Poland, Norway, and Sweden, respectively. Due to unlucky wars the Danish kingdom diminished, until during the nineteenth century it broadly comprised its central parts, i.e. Denmark less Schleswig, disregarding Island, Greenland and the Faroes. The area of the Danes (Jutland, Funen, and Sealand with its surrounding islands) was inhabited all the years by descendants of the original North Germanic people Jutlanders and Danes. The name Danes goes back to the Old English word daun which is said to mean valley (dal in Danish) and thus the notion Danes means “lowland inhabitants”. 

Through history there has been an insignificant immigration to Denmark of foreign people or cultures, i.a. Huguenots, Jews, Herrnhuts etc., but no more than a few thousand people in all who soon became part of the Danes and without problems took part in the various functions of society. Only with the heavy immigration from muslim countries, such as the Middle East, Africa and Asia during the second part of th twentieth century, did it create considerable financial, cultural, and social problems for Denmark although the purpose of the immigration was precisely to meet financial, social problems etc. in the emigration countries as well as the immigration countries.

However, looking back at the latest 30 years of immigration we must conclude that a certain group of immigrants alone creates essential problems. Nobody who has kept abreast of developments in recent times can feel doubt that the immigrants in question are muslim groups from North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia. 

Danmarks Statistik (the Central Statistical Office)

In recent times the press has frequently mentioned figures such as 100,000, 200,000 whereas others insist on half a million or even up to one million. What is right? The press itself, and politicians when debating in the press, use notions and figures in connection with various immigration groups without  further difinitions or differentiation between the groups concerned. This inadequacy often results in mistakes thus misinforming audience and readers. In these debates more participants have come up with very different figures as regards the number of muslims in Denmark, often based on very different grounds and sources to which they cannot usually refer. 

In his book “Gud er stor  - om islam og kristendom” (God is almighty – about Islam and Christianity), published in 1994, Bishop Niels Henrik Arendt states that there are 170,000 muslims in Denmark. When asked, i.a. in connection with his lectures about Islam, the bishop has explained that the figure have been found in “municipal telephone books”. However, in his lectures the bishop has not found it necessary to revise the figures upwards based on the immigration since 1994. Furthermore, it is doubtful whether the bishop has contacted all the approximately 300 municipalities (before the municipal reform in 2006/07), and it is doubtful whether the municipalities have been able to bring out figures ( number of muslims) which Danmarks Statistik declare not to have. However, the reliability of the bishop qua his position has led to the fact that great importance has been attached to the figure 170,000. Lars Hedgaard has often been quoted to set the number of muslims in Denmark to about 200,000 based on the screening of a list at Danmarks Statistik stating Christian names and muslim names, respectively.  Howver, the bank of Danmarks Statistik are of no help. 

Danmarks Statistik and Statistikbanken (the bank of statistics)

Earlier Danmarks Statistik had a table on Internet  in which the inquirer could be informed of all first names according to frequency, but today the table of the “Statistikbanken” is unfortunately arranged in a way which only permits the inquirer to choose one name after which he will be informed of the number of persons in the country bearing that name. Nor does the table indicate whether the number only includes persons with Danish citizenship or whether it also includes  foreigners living in Denmark with residence permit. If the figures, which Lars Hedegaard has chosen as his starting point, only comprise Danish citizens then his figures are based on the app. 200,000 Danish citizens of foreign origin, as the figures do not include the muslim part of the 270,051 foreigners living in Denmark (as on Janyary 1, 2006), several of whom have still not been granted Danish nationality. Thus, by re-arranging the tables and search possibilities Danmarks Statistik have prevented control and follow-up.   

The conclusion of the above must be, among other things, that Danmarks Statistik must be persuaded to offer statistics and tables as soon as possible on which religious affiliations are shown, as an example, and to calculate the number of persons who have beeb granted Danish nationality, or who are descendants of persons who have been granted Danish nationality. Not only should the population be divided according to their citizenships and their Danish or foreign origin, but descendants should also be divided according to the Danish or foreign origin of their parents.

The present difinition of a “Dane” is unsatisfactory. Some years ago Statistisk Årbog (Statistic Annual) had a table stating the number of persons in Denmark according to their religious community. Twenty years ago it was mainly “Folkekirken” (the established church in Denmark), and various Christian sects such as Jehovah’s witnesses, the Jewish community and a small group of other sects. But some years ago this table fell out of Statistisk Årbog.

Pay attention to words and definitions

In 1985 our former Prime Minister, Poul Schlüter from the Conservative party said: “I know that many Danes feel uneasy about the open national borders for fear of being flooded with half a million or a whole million foreigners. This frightens people, but of course this shall not happen. For the time being refugees only amount to 0,3 % of the population”. Notice that Poul Schlüter talked about refugees. Neither did he mention foreigners nor immigrants. On January 1, 1985 the total number of inhabitants (persons with residence permit, i.e. including immigrants and their descendants) in Denmark was 5,111,108 according to Statistisk Årbog from 1987. A little arithmetic shows that 0,3% of 5,111,108 persons only amount to 15,333. Add to this that other figures from Danmarks Statistik reveal that the total of immigrants was 140,566 in 1985 while their descendants amounted to 23,360. That means that 163,926 persons or 3,2% of the inhabitants in Denmark were of foreign origin. Consequently, the number of immigrants was 10 times higher than the number predicted. It remains obscure what figures the former minister used as well as his interpretation of the word “refugees”. However, Poul Schlüther’s conclusion was that only a few would arrive and that the fear of the Danes was unfounded. Still, he said that it should alarm the Danes should the country be flooded by half a million or one million people, “but that will not happen”. Maybe Poul Schlüther’s calculations only comprised foreigners who had come to Denmark as refugees the year in question and who had not yet achieved residence permit or citizenship. However, Poul Schlüther’s estimate of the future was wrong. In January 2006 we soon approached half a million people, as quoted above, and so this number of people was reached only 15 years later. The question is whether half a million people of foreign origin have reached the limit which might now make the Danes understand that this number is worth discussing.

On the arena of politics there has been a considerable disinclination to release figures and decide how many immigrants Denmark is able to receive without the values and socio-financial basis of the country  being destroyed. In the press the words “foreigners” and “immigrants” are often used at random without any proper and unambiguous definition of the group of persons referred to. A “foreigner” will normally be a person with residence permit in Denmark but who has kept his origin nationality, or has not yet been granted Danish nationality. Contrary to this a person can be considered Danish when he has a Danish citizenship either achieved by birth or granted according to the law (naturalization). 

A “foreigner” will normally be looked on as a person who has immigrated in order to work or to marry. Today many of the persons who are mentioned as immigrants or real “refugees”, who have obtained asylium, have consequently changed their status from “refugees” to “immigrants” by way of permanent residence permits. 

A “refugee” is an applicant for asylum who has not yet obtained residence permit. When he has got his residence permit he is considered an immigrant. Therefore, there are rather few “refugees” in Denmark. For one thing this number of refugees is being considerably reduced  due to the tightening of the legislation. Spouses of immigrants who have been brought to Denmark by way of family reunion and descendants are not considered refugees but “immigrants”. When these various notions are mentioned in the press it is seldom explained to what group the press refers. 

The following definitions are used by Danmarks Statistik

An immigrant is a person born in a foreign country  and whoes parents are both of them foreign citizens or born in a foreign country (or one of the parents, if there is no information of the other). If there is no information about any of the parents, and the person is born in a foreign country, the person will  be considered an immigrant. A descendant is a person born in Denmark where none of the parents are of Danish nationality. If there is  no information of any of the parents, and the person in question is a foreign citizen, the person will also be considered a descendant. 

A Dane is a person with at least one parent of Danish nationality and born in Denmark, irrespective of  the person’s native land and citizenship. Should there be no information of any of the parents the person shall be considered Danish if the person is a Danish citizen and born in Denmark. What is a “foreigner” compared to “immigrants and descendants”? Briefly spoken, a foreigner is a person living in Denmark but who is not of  Danish nationality. That means that a foreigner can live in Denmark with residence permit and work permit but without Danish nationality. This could be the English ingineer at a machine factory or the Thailand wife of the first officer at Mærsk. 

Status: as on January 1, 2006 – there are 620,000 muslims in Denmark 

I their statistics Danmarks Statistik use standing definitions of the conceptions of Danes, immigrants, and descendants. Danmarks Statistik organize various groups according to citizenship counting “Danes”, “immigrants”, and “descendants”. Still, Danes can also be “descendants of immigrants”. In Statistisk Årbog and other publications from Danmarks Statistik (see dst.dk on the subject) they calculate the number of Danes, foreigners, and their descendants. It is possible to get information about the number of persons of foreign origion and see if they still have their original citizenships or they have been granted Danish nationality (i.e. if they have been “neutralized”). It is important to  the reader to know the definitions used by Danmarks Statistik of the notions Danes, foreigners etc. as these definitions are of crucial importance to understand the figures. 

The whole country                                                              Citizenship                                Total

January 1, 2006                                                         Danish               Foreigners         Both groups

a. Danish origin                                                           4 957 171                    7 053               4.964.224

b. Immigrants                                                                123 102                 227 334                  350.436

c. Descendants                                                                77 135                   35 664                  112.799

b+c. Immigrants and descendants                           200.237                 262.998                 463.235

Total                                                                                  5.157.408                270.051               5.427.459

Source: http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1152

This table states that on January 1, 2006 there were 463,235 immigrants and descendants in Denmark 200,237 of whom were of Danish nationality, whereas 262,998 had foreign citizenships. What misunderstanding could these figures cause? Well, Danmarks Statistik use their definition on Danes, immigrants, and descendants. That means that within the group of Danes there is a big number of immigrants of first and second generation who are registered as Danes although their “culture” including language and behavior etc., might be strongly influenced by the Middle East. They have been registered as Danes if one of their parents, e.g. their mother, has been granted Danish nationality before the delivery of the child, even though the father might have been brought to Denmarks recently by family reunion from Libanon (Palestine). According to this definition the number of descendants will be modest and must cause surprise when the birthrate within families from the Middle East is taken into consideration. In newspaper articles only the number of foreigners is often mentioned which means the the number does not include those born in a foreign country but of Danish nationality which they have then  been granted later. So we talk about a group of 262,998 (as on January 1, 2006) without including the numerous immigrants and their descendants who have given up their original citizenship for a Danish citizenship. This state of affairs is not mentioned which gives the readers the impression that the number of  “strangers” is considerable lower than is actually the case. 

How many muslims were there in
Denmark on January 1, 2006?

Immigrants from muslims countries (about 80% of 463,235) are about 370,000. Second and third generation of immigrants are registered as Danes which is equal to 150,000 – 200,000 immigrants. Illigal immigrants equal to 25,000 – 50,000 maybe more. That is equal to 620,000 persons. On the basis of the number of  immigrants coming from countries which must be considered muslim countries it can be estimated that abour 80% of the number of immigrants are muslims. Among immigrants from e.g. Sweden and England there will also be quite many muslims.  These are the figures Danmarks Statistik will neither confirm nor deny as the Danish politicians have not wanted clarity in terms of figures which might prove the extent of the most essential problem for the Danish society within historical time.  We often read in newspapers that the authorities mention excessive frequency of crimes, certain illness, unemployment etc. among immigrants. But in order to compare immigrants with the ethnic Danish people it is necessary to know the number of both population groups. The question is whether some authorities know the exact figures. It is imperatively important to give the entire Danish population the accurate information to enable them to take a stand. 

Acquisition of Danish nationality (neutralization)

The number of persons who been granted Danish nationality by neutralization  (published by law in the Danish Legal Gazette and passed in Folketinget) only comprise adult applicants, whereas children, who are the offspring of these applicants and automatically obtain Danish nationality with their parents, are not included in the figures of the consolidation act. Consequently, the figures of foreigners stated by Immigrant services are higher that those of the consolidation act.                                                                                                          

                                                                                                              Differences in numbers

                                                                                                              of citizenships of the

                                                                    Stated by                          consolidation act and  

Year              Stated by                    Danmarks Statistik         the figures of Statistikbanken 

                 Consolidation act           in Statistikbanken          covering the year in question  

1979                                                           6.249           

1980                                                           3.780          

1981                                                           3.642           1982                                                           3.029          

1983                                                           2.798          

1984                                                           2.740          

1985                                                           3.310          

1986                                                           3.623          

1987                                                           3.765          

1988                     2.273                             3.747                                          1.474

1989                     2.263                             3.258                                             995

1990                     1.824                             3.028                                          1.204

1991                     3.837                             5.490                                          1.653

1992                     2.789                             5.118                                          2.329

1993                     3.135                             5.136                                          2.001

1994                     2.439                             5.767                                          3.228

1995                     2.641                             5.266                                          2.625

1996                     3.919                             7.289                                          3.370

1997                     2.061                             5.487                                          3.426

1998                     3.848                           10.277                                          6.429

1999                     6.718                           12.478                                          5.760

2000                     9.022                           19.323                                        10.301

2001                     4.743                           11.892                                          7.149

2002                 10.101                             16.662                                          6.561

2003                     3.748                             6.583                                          2.835

2004                     5.740                           14.976                                          9.236

2005                       5.899                           10.197                                         4.298____________________                                 

Source: The Danish Legal Gazette 1987-2004 and Danmarks Statistik, Statistikbanken(http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1152)

From 1979 til 2006 a total of 184,910 persons have been granted Danish nationality. This corresponds to about the entire population as on January 1, 2004 in 7 towns in South and North Schleswig: Tønder (8,033), Sønderborg (26,959) Aabenraa (16,255), Haderslev (20,974), Vojens (7,831), Kolding (54,941), and Vejle (48,817)  corresponding in total to the 7 towns mentioned i.e.  185,110. The number of citizens stated by law and published in the Danish Legal Gazette is lower than that of  Danmarks Statistik, cf.  Statistikbanken. 

Possible misunderstandings

If our starting point is the number of persons stated in the consolidation act, which is the legal basis for acquisitions of citizenships, we will get a number which is considerably lower than that of the Immigrant service as well as that of Danmarks Statistik. It is possible that the number of children, who are automatically granted Danish nationality with their parents, is not included in the consolidation act. Children born of these persons, after the latters have been granted Danish nationality, are registered as Danes if just one parent is of Danish nationality. 

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 2 kommentarer »

Ændring af vores blog – Change of our blog

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

Da vi har fået mange henvendelser fra udlandet har vi valgt, midlertidigt, at ændre vores blog så der nu bliver bragt oversatte tekster fra vores hjemmeside og andre relevante artikler på engelsk her på bloggen fra nu af.

As we have got many enquiries from abroad we have chosen, provisionally, to change our blog so from now on there will be published translated texts from our homepage and other relevant articles in english here on the blog.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 2 kommentarer »

SIAD. Battling On…

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

SIAD. Battling On…

SIAD, the Danish organisation to Stop The Islamification of Denmark has met another obstacle in their efforts to hold a simple, peaceful demonstration.

Having convinced the Minister for Justice, Lene Espersen, that using the emergency judicial paragraph to stop them on the grounds that they would cause public disorder is not acceptable as they, the demonstrators, are a peaceful bunch who don’t threaten anyone, SIAD applied for a license to demonstrate in Nørrebro in Copenhagen, scheduled for the 24th of this month.
The theme of this protest was to highlight freedom of speech in precisely that area of Copenhagen. An area where the police are slowly but surely losing their grip…!

Unfortunately, the chief constable, Hanne Bech Hansen, (yes, the chief constable is a woman) is quoting the same emergency paragraph, #79, to stop the demo, again.
The police have been nice enough to offer an alternative venue, but that is not acceptable to SIAD.

Let’s take a step back for a moment. The Minister for Justice accepts, after a lot of discussion and a great deal of pressure, that SIAD is planning to execute a peaceful demonstration and therefore paragraph 79 is not applicable. She says, “OK, go ahead”.
The chief constable says otherwise. So she is defying the Minister for Justice? That effectively makes her reasons for stopping the demo somewhat illegal or, at the very least, invalid.
It sounds to me as if Lene and Hanne ought to get together on this one and decide just who is the boss here!

There is, however, a little twist in the tale here. While Lene Espersen says that paragraph 79 can’t be used to stop SIAD demonstrating in general, she is prepared to use the emergency paragraph to stop SIAD demonstrating in certain places.
So basically, we now have an official “no-go” area in Denmark? How say you, Lene Espersen?

SIAD is considering pointing out to the police that is they who have been given the task of defending the right of the citizenry to peacefully assemble, no matter where they choose so to do, in this land. Including Nørrebro.

They may be naive, they may be newbies, they may even be irritating to some, but SIAD is taking the battle up against the PC loonies.

First, SIAD had to convince the Minister for Justice that they are a peaceable bunch. That happened.
Now they have to persuade the Chief Constable. That will, I hope, happen.

I don’t know how much the letters and e-mails from the 910 group helped with Lene Espersen. I hope the group will follow up on this. Maybe we should all get the pens out again and explain to Lene E. how disappointed we are to hear of the tragic loss of Nørrebro to a foreign occupation. I find it worrying. I have friends that live there.

As I said somewhere before, this is a battle that has to be won.

Link; SIAD. Danish website.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | Leave a Comment »

Sneaking Islamization

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

February 12, 2007 by Baron Bodissey | 910 Group | 00:41:52 | Comments [2] |

I’ve previously written about a Danish counterjihad group called SIAD, “Stop the Islamization of Denmark”. SIAD has been harassed and even subjected to violence in its opposition to creeping sharia within Denmark. It is being vilified as a reactionary and racist hate group.

Anders GraversAnd now SIAD has become a political party. Anders Gravers, the founder of the group, emailed me today with the translation of SIAD’s mission statement and the “who we are” section of the SIAD website.

I’ve often said that Denmark is way ahead of the rest of the West, and can serve as a model of how to handle an aggressive and expansionist Islam. The model can’t be applied in all respects — Denmark is a tiny country with a homogeneous native population — but some of its strategies can be adapted by other countries.

Denmark is a representative democracy with a written constitution and the rule of law. It respects the rights of free speech and assembly. Under those constraints, SIAD is proposing a series of steps to deal with the encroachment of Islam.

You can read what SIAD has to say below.

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Our mission

Although it should be unnecessary to mention it, we do so for the sake of clarity: We believe in our mission!

Holger DanskeOur conviction is not based on naive imagination, nor on arrogance, nor on a lack of realism. On the contrary, it comes from a deep feeling of responsibility for our children and descendants, and for our country in general. We are of the opinion that our country is in peril, as stated in the old poem about Holger Danske. To us this famous poem means that when our country is faced with a real dilemma, the Dane (the personification of the original people) will show his true face and rise from his chair and do what has to be done.

We feel this vocation very deeply, hearing the call for help from our ancestral home. Someone has to do something before it is too late. Now is the time, as it is five minutes to twelve! Unfortunately, we cannot count on any help or leadership from our governing politicians, and therefore we have decided that this “someone” should be us, SIAD. Nobody else seems to have thought about getting involved.

A winning cause

Another important reason for us to be sure of our mission is that we know we have a winning cause. We are convinced that justice will be done, if not today, then tomorrow.

In this way, we are exactly as decisive and firm in our fight for Denmark as are our opponents among the Islamists (and their tools, the useful idiots) in their fight against Denmark. We know the forbearance and kindness of the Danish people. “We want peace in this country” — as we sing on the Midsummer eve — but there will come a time for all of us when we cannot put up with any more. And that time has already come! Thus we have decided to ignore all the divisions normally separating public movements into political parties, and rise up in a common front against the Islamic occupying power. Therefore we urge the Danish people to join the Danish Unity Party, the ideal of which is to recreate the same sense of community that they experienced during the former occupation of this country.

SIADConsequently, SIAD has no political profile except for the fact that we want to stop the process which leads Denmark toward an Islamic dictatorship.

Such an ambition is certainly not non-political, but it does not include any defined positions on financial, cultural and environmental politics, or any other conventional political doctrines. We trust the politicians with such subjects, since they are much more qualified than we are to sit and talk for hours at meetings. However, what we intend to do is to get into Parliament in order to secure the basis for the discussions about environmental, financial, cultural topics, etc., because such topics will not be allowed under an Islamic theocracy. When that day comes one will simply be required to ask the leading imam about the principles of the sharia on the subject in question. Any subsequent discussion will be understood — and punished — as heresy.

An arrangement as described above shall never be tolerated by the Danish people. Of this we are certain. Therefore we also know that we are right — on a totally democratic basis — and if we win we do it by way of democracy.

Confidence is positive

The Danish people have an extremely high degree of confidence in their elected politicians. In addition, our degree of confidence in each other is among the highest in the world.

This confidence in our society brings about a rather unconventional public stance towards the authorities, but at the same time a very strong consensus of attitude, too, due to our fundamental confidence in the political system.

Because of this implicit orthodoxy we believe that those who have been given the task of taking care of the interests of our country must do their utmost. That is, purely and simply, what we expect. And we have no doubt that each of them will do their utmost in this respect. None of our politicians, public servants, or other persons in honorary offices should want to act in bad faith and thereby put our country in jeopardy. They are convinced that they do the right thing when they sell off the assets of our country. They believe that they do their country and their people a favour if they buy “peace” by paying for the mixing of our society with the entire world population.

They really believe that it is possible to have a dialog with religious fanatics, that it is possible to talk reason with an Islamist, and that Danish values concerning welfare and democracy are universal blessings which everybody would strive to be part of.

That is what they have learned in the “school of decency”, at universities and by training within their political parties. They are so convinced that the Danish model is just as beautiful, seaworthy and impossible to sink as the Titanic, that they completely ignore the danger towards which the country is now heading.

We have a clear vision that Denmark is heading for the same fate as that of the beautiful ship which sailed to its death with drums and flags and on full steam.

The blunder was — and is — due to a state of self-important drunkenness brought about by their fantastic voyage. They totally neglect to keep their eyes on the dangers for which they are directly heading.

Be on guard!

At the risk of acting as wet blankets at the party of respectable citizens, we take the liberty to point out the danger of the sneaking (now gradually becoming obvious) Islamization of this country. Therefore, we take every opportunity to issue a “call to arms”.

This initiative finds expression in various actions and press campaigns in which we point out, lay open, and show the dangers for Danish society caused by the increasing Islamization. Our aim is to awaken the Danish people. The politicians in power have long ago shown their deafness towards warnings about Islamization. The only way to awaken these people is to punish them on election day for their irresponsibility.

In Parliament

As a consequence of the lack of political leadership in Denmark in general, and within the Government in particular (not meeting the increasing Islamization of Denmark), the resistance group “Stop islamiseringen af Danmark” (SIAD) has decided to stand for Parliament.

In Parliament our only cause shall be to fight for Denmark to remain a secure home for Danes with a democratic, open, and tolerant attitude. In Parliament — as well as outside of Parliament — we shall fight every initiative to sell out Danish values to the Islamic power. This fight shall be carried out within the law, of course, as we still have the law on our side. However, if the Islamists attain their objective, democratic and freedom-loving organizations and movements like ours shall be prohibited. Should we end in such a situation, the battle to recover the control of our country will be harder. Thus we must strike while the iron is hot — while we still have the law on our side.

Therefore, we insist that the Danish Constitution be kept and respected. Not one single comma is misplaced.

Your help

If you agree that Denmark should remain a free and democratic society based on respect and confidence, you can do something about it by letting SIAD be your representative in Parliament.

And we shall see to it that something happens — be sure of that!Actions speak louder than words!

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

Who is SIAD?

  • We are a political party whose purpose is to keep the Constitution of the Kingdom of Denmark
  • We support the Danish democracy as we know it today
  • We fight anything and anyone who will limit Danish sovereignty
  • We consider ourselves to be the only active resistance group against Islam.

We are a just group of ordinary citizens who have become very tired of the sneaking Islamization of Danish society.

Within a short time (30 years) this country, which has been the home of the Danish people for thousands of years, has been moving — slowly but surely — towards an Islamic society governed by Islamic law.

Researchers at the University of Copenhagen, after conducting population studies, have calculated that the ethnic Danes (the original population) will become a very small minority in their own country by the end of this century.

And, since according to the Koran the Muslims are not allowed to marry Christians or people from other religions — unless these convert to Islam — and since the Muslims are the fastest-growing population group in Denmark, the future majority will consequently consist of sympathizers with Islam.

Future Denmark?

The sneaking Islamization has come about because a minority has shouted so loudly that nice Danish people are now organizing the Danish society according to Islamic law. In this country, which is so proud of being a pioneer for sexual equality, it now seems that in several swimming baths women and men can no longer swim at the same time, and that it is now permissible to divide the halls between men and women at Islamic meetings in municipal buildings. This country, which has so far made a good profit from worldwide pork exports, is now forced to serve meat only from halal-slaughtered animals to their new generation in the Copenhagen kindergartens. Pork is excluded, to the annoyance of Christians and Buddhists — and Hindus, too, who are not allowed to eat beef.

Denmark, which is famous worldwide for its beautiful women and its broad-mindedness, has now got a sharia police force (groups of young muslims) who annoy Danes who are naked on the Sealand beaches, and in general harass young girls who are alone on the beach, because it is against Islamic law.

Islamization has really increased

Islamization has really increased since the Muhammed cartoon crisis. In the aftermath of the crisis the politically correct press has given its approval to the regulations of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement (read here), which states that nice syrupy stories about Muslims should incessantly be told to the Danes in order to integrate the latter into the future Muslim society.

Never before have we seen and heard so much talk about Muslims in TV and radio as we do now. The most recent incident was DR 2’s stroke of genius in hiring Asmaa Absol-Hamid as TV host wearing a scarf (hijab). A slap in the face for all those people in Denmark working for sexual equality! A stroke of genius because nobody dares to remove her now, since this might cause a new clash with misogynistic Islam. An inevitable clash because this Asmaa Abdol-Hamid was among the first to complain of the Muhammed cartoons and thus is to be blamed herself for the crisis Denmark had to face.

From Borgerliste [list of citizens’ signatures for obtaining representation in the city council] to a political party

Summa summarum: All the above points are what we call a “sneaking Islamization” of Danish society. Because we would not tolerate this development, we established the Borgerliste “Stop the Islamization of Denmark” which ran in the local election in Ålborg. We got 2% of the votes, which was not enough to get us into the local council. However, 1300 votes represent a lot of people of the same opinion as ours. This encouraged us to change the Borgerliste “Stop the Islamization of Denmark” into a political party against the sneaking Islamization of our country.

Now our goal is not to stop until Denmark has banned the parts of the Koran prescribing that the unbelievers shall be harassed, tortured, and killed. This is not a war between civilizations, as argued by some people, but a war between a stone age religion and modern civilization.

We shall not accept a cultural decline of the Danish people and their country just because of a gang of frightened politicians.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 1 Kommentar »

Update on SIAD

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

January 20, 2007 by Zonka | 910 Group | 02:44:48 | Comments [2] |

From Jyllands-Posten today:

Political group files Charges against police and minister
By Kristoffer Pinholt
Minister of Justice Lene Espersen (Cons.) and Chief police Inspector Per Larsen and Police Director Hanne Bech have been reported to the police

Friday the party Stop Islamification of Denmark (SIAD) filed charges against Lene Espersen and Copenhagen Police, personified by chief police inspector Per Larsen and police director Hanne Bech. The step was taken because SIAD is furious that the police according to the party have not put enough resources in on solving a violent attack on several members of the party, and because Copenhagen Police have disallowed a demonstration by the party on Blågårdsgade on Nørrebro.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 3 kommentarer »

Update on the Attack on SIAD

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

January 14, 2007 by Zonka | 910 Group | 22:32:57 | Comments [5] |

The following is a translation of the attack on a SIAD meeting yesterday, that took place at Valby Medborgerhus in Copenhagen. (h/t: Exile) and taken from SIAD’s webpage.

An attack on all of the Danish Democracy

Siad is a legal and peaceful democratic party that supports democracy as we know it: democracy, freedom of speech equality between the sexes and animal welfare. Lately we have become mostly known in the media because of our demonstrations that pays homage to the Danish freedom of speech (look here). But countless times the Minister of Justice Lene Espersen have denied our demonstrations in Gellerup, [A suburb of Aarhus, with a majority of muslim immogrants — ed] Vollsmose [A suburb of Odense, with a majority of muslim immigrants] and Nørrebro [A part of Copenhagen with a strong influx of muslim immigrants] and lately she have found that §75 in the Danish Constitution supports our side (read below), the Ministry of Justice have declared emergency law agains Siad.

Thus she have prevented our constitutional right and indirectly legitimized the autonome attack on Siads meeting at Valby Medborgerhus, yesterday afternoon (Saturday) where we discussed Siads bill. Since when the State shows that one cannot freely speak all places in the country and doesn’t support the constitutional rights, the foggy brains only perceive that freedom of speech is a bad thing if it can upset immigrants. So all in all the spineless government have legitimized the attack on Siad.

At approx. 3pm there were a forceful knock on the door to Siads closed meeting. The dor was opened and the the door opening was filled with hooded and masked autonomes armed with bottles which the throws at the people in the meeting while yelling “Now you shall die, pigs!” But four courageous Siad members jumps directly at them and thus saves the res of the Siad meeting participants of which some are elderly people. They take the fight into the hallway, but three of them are severely injured by thrown bottles. Despite being outnumbered and with blood running down their faces they force the autonome gang of about eight people to flee.

The three wounded will later be rewarded with Siads newly instituted medal for wounded in battle against Islam. As it now shows that Islam and the autonome have shaken hands on fighting the democratic society and attack people who dares to show the problem that Denmark faces today: Islam versus Democracy. The autonomes have found themselves comfortable in their dhimmi-status, useful idiots for Islam in the fight against freedom of speech. Thus it has been shown that the autonomes have become errand boys and spills for Islam.

Now is the time for society to react. This is not just an attack on a democratic and non-violent party, but on the Danish freedom of speech and assembly.

*** UPDATE ***
As many are not familiar with the term autonomes I’ll explain… The autonomes are a spinoff of the BZ movement in the 70s and 80s who were squatters and generally very leftist youngsters, punkers and generally troublemakers, who are a part of an alternative rather aggressive youth movement known in many major cities in Europe.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | Leave a Comment »

On The Wing: Danish Resistance

Skrevet af siad på februar 16, 2007

We received this request, asking 

“if the 910 group would chime in on this and bring some international pressure to bear on the Minister for Justice to allow these brave Danes their right to free protest? A thousand e-mails from outside the border might make them sit up and take notice. … There is a limited amount of information available on SAID’s website. The site is in Danish. [Translation will be forthcoming; if you have it — post it in the comments section]

The Ministry for Justice, and thereby Lene Espersen, can be contacted by e-mail at jm@jm.dk

Drop them a line, asking why they denied SIAD their democratic right.”

I have written and asked just that. If I get a response, it will be posted here in the comments. Here is the rest of Exile’s post, providing background on the situation:

There is an organisation here in little Denmark that is apparently not allowed to demonstrate peacefully and freely on the streets of Denmark. This organisation is made up of ordinary Danes with a peaceful and democratic message to all, but the Danish Minister for Justice, Lene Espersen, is denying them the right to publicly, and peacefully, go out and demonstrate by forbidding them to demonstrate because she fears for public order. Not from the demonstators, but from their critics.

Violent critics.

She fears the demonstration would cause public disorder because these peacable demonstrators would be attacked by their opponents.

The organisation is called SIAD. Which freely translates into English as “Stop the Islamification of Denmark”.

I find it strange, that Hamas, Hezbollah and any other Islamic group can freely demonstrate in the middle of Copenhagen, waving their terrorist flags and carrying their hateful banners, burning our flag and inciting to murder unopposed, while a home grown grass roots movement that opposes the islamification of their own society is banned from the same right to protest. Has Denmark gone mad? No. Only the politicians, especially Lene Espersen.

Our democracy has to be protected. It has to be defended. The politicians will not do this for us. Their main interest is to stay where they are for as long as possible and not make waves big enough to threaten their huge income or their beloved portfolios. To hell with principles. This is about money and power. And we wouldn’t want the ordinary man on the street to find out that he is being slowly and surely sold down the river by political indifference.

I would point out, that if they allow the islamists to eventually overrun this land, they will be equally out of a job as most of the rest of us. Unless they convert to Islam.

Okay, let’s get this question powered up:

ACTION NEEDED:

Write to The Ministry for Justice, Lene Espersen, at jm@jm.dk
and ask why they denied SIAD their democratic right.

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 1 Kommentar »

1. spontane demonstration

Skrevet af siad på februar 13, 2007

 Lørdag d. 16 dec. gennemførte SIAD en demonstration udenfor City Vest i Gellerup. Politiet har utallige gange forhindret SIAD i at gennemføre demonstrationer i ghettoerne Gellerup, Vollsmose og Nørrebro, hvilket de uretmæssigt har gjort efter § 79 i Grundloven. Det har Justitsministeren nu indrømmet, og i sin fortvivlelse, har hun nu grebet til nødlove, sidst brugt mod modstandsbevægelsen i 2. verdenskrig og seneste tilfælde i nyere tid mod at rockere kunne forsamles i deres klubhuse.

Dette er ganske alvorlige foranstaltninger justitsministeren her tager i anvendelse, fordi dette medfører en lang række spørgsmål: Hvor lang tid gælder denne nødlov? Er det så lang tid vi har fremmede i landet, der vil sætte dagsordenen for, om et lovligt demokratisk parti kan bruge sine grundlovssikrede rettigheder? Hvis det forholder sig sådan, er demokratiet vel egentligt ophørt? For en regering der sidder og styrer nødlove som er tidsubestemte, har reelt sat Grundloven ud af kraft.

Disse tiltag ligner til forveksling de tiltag regeringen under 2. verdenskrig indførte sammen med den tyske besættelsesmagt. For man kan ikke sammenligne de nødlove man vedtog omkring rockerne, med det man nu forsøger gennemført mod SIAD, fru justitsminister Lene Espersen. Under rockerkrigen brugte begge grupperinger våben mod hinanden. I SIADs tilfælde er det eneste problem, at man ikke kan lukke munden på os.

Det er politikernes store problem at de har slæbt store grupper af muslimske indvandrere til landet, der på trods af 3 generationer endnu ikke har lært at der findes ytringsfrihed og forsamlingsfrihed i dette land. Politikerne er tilsynelandende blevet påvirket af disse, da denne lærdom ser ud til at være ved at gå i glemmebogen for dem også. Hvem sagde “kulturberigelse”?

SIAD nægter at acceptere, at Grundloven er sat ud af kraft, derfor henholder vi os til § 79 i Grundloven der siger: “Borgerne har ret til uden forudgående tilladelse at samle sig ubevæbnede”. Denne del af Grundloven har SIAD tænkt sig at bruge overalt i ghettoerne indtil disse ulovligheder ophører.

Vi gennemførte vellykket den første af disse forsamlinger, som vi kalder “forlang-dit-land-tilbage”, lørdag d. 16. dec., da 20 medlemmer af Stop islamiseringen af Danmark mødte op ude foran City Vest i Gellerup.

Anders Gravers holdt en kort tale om baggrunden for disse forsamlinger. Derefter bevægede forsamlingen sig mod hovedindgangen til City Vest, men blev dog stoppet af 2 arabiskudseende vagtmænd, der sagde at City Vest er privat grund og at vi derfor ikke var velkomne der. SIAD som disse lovlydige borgere de er, flyttede da skiltene ud på fortovet langs City Vest. På skiltene stod der bl.a. Stop volden mod de ældre. Hvorfor min farmor? Stop ildspåsættelserne. Stop stenkast mod politiet. Stop stenkast mod brandvæsnet. Stop voldtægterne. Stop røverierne. Gælder grundloven ikke her?

Vi kan endnu engang konstatere efter vores aktion, at det ikke er SIAD der er et problem, men voldelige moddemonstranter der som regel bliver tiltrukket ved politiets tilstedeværelse, da denne aktion forløb i ro og orden og uden problemer i hjertet af Gellerup..

Alt i alt en vellykket forsamling – den første af mange.

 

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 2 kommentarer »

Kære Folketingspolitiker

Skrevet af siad på februar 13, 2007

Her følger SIADs brev som er afleveret til samtlige folketingspolitikere.Vi har givet politikerne 14 dage fra fredag d. 13. okt. til at vise hensigt til at ville overholde grundloven. Hvis ikke, vil SIAD gennemføre sin nye demonstrationsrække uden politiets viden og medvirken, ifølge § 79 i grundloven: “Borgerne har ret til uden forudgående tilladelse at samle sig ubevæbnede.”

Kære Folketingspolitiker

Da du blev medlem af folketinget, skrev du under på at ville overholde Det Danske Riges Grundlov.

Vi skriver til dig for at gøre opmærksom på, at grundloven er blevet brudt adskillige gange indenfor de sidste 4 måneder.

Partiet og foreningen Stop islamiseringen af Danmark (SIAD) har 4 gange fået nej til at gennemføre fuldt lovlige demonstrationer. Politiet har brugt § 79 til at nægte os demonstrationerne idet de befrygter fare for den offentlige orden.

Men da politiet ikke befrygter fare fra SIAD, men derimod fra evt. moddemonstranter, kan de ikke bruge § 79 til at nægte SIAD at demonstrere. De kan bruge § 79 til at forbyde en evt. voldelig moddemonstration, idet det er fra moddemonstranterne at faren udspringer.

Ydermere har politiet i Århus sørget for at SIAD ikke kunne afholde deres planlagte offentlige informationsmøde på Hovedbiblioteket d. 28. sep., idet de har kontaktet biblioteket og informeret dem om de evt. farer der kunne opstå, hvis modstandere af SIAD skulle dukke op og lave ballade. Dette førte til at biblioteket nægtede SIAD at afholde mødet på biblioteket.

Igen er det ikke SIAD der er problemet, men evt. ballademagere, som i disse tilfælde får lov at sætte dagsordenen og dermed ulovligt forhindre en lovlig forening og parti at bruge deres grundlovssikrede rettigheder til at afholde informationsmøder og demonstrationer, jvf § 77.

Men i lyset af at man gentagne gange uberettiget har brugt § 79 som forebyggende forholdsregel mod den frie debat, har det taget karakter af den censur man udtrykkeligt stadfæster i § 77 ingensinde på ny kan indføres.

Det kan ikke passe, at ulovlige kræfter og parallelsamfund med vold og trusler kan sætte grundloven ud af kraft.

Nu har vi informeret dig om disse klare grundlovsbrud, kære folketingsmedlem. Det er nu op til dig at leve op til grundlovens ord og gøre noget ved denne uholdbare situation, fordi i SIAD har vi ikke tænkt os at finde os i disse klare brud på grundloven.

Det er faktisk vores pligt som borgere at reagere.

Venlig hilsen

Anders Gravers,

Stop islamiseringen af Danmark (SIAD

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | Leave a Comment »

Borgerskabet retsstaten og demokratiet

Skrevet af siad på februar 7, 2007

Det er ofte diskuteret, hvad der giver et borgerskab i staten Danmark. Tidligere har staten med rund hånd delt borgerskaber ud, til alle der havde boet her i Danmark i et stykke tid – uanset tro, nationalitet, religion eller parathed til demokrati.

Men er det nu også fornuftigt?

I dag har vi konflikter med fanatikere, antidemokrater og meget andet – så det var det måske ikke.

Det grundlæggende spørgsmål må da være: Hvad giver et borgerskab?

Hør hvad Aristoteles, den oprindelige inspirator til demokratiet, har at sige om den sag:

[1]Vi forsøger at finde ud af hvad der giver et borgerskab i sin korrekte definition[2], en definition uden defekter, som er helt rigtig. … Borgeren i denne definition er bedst defineret med det kriterium at han deltager i administrationen af retten og har et offentligt embede. Offentlige embeder kan være et af to. Nogle er tidsbegrænset… Andre, derimod, har ingen tidsbegrænsning, for eksempel [3]lægdommere, eller medlemmer af den folkelige forsamling[4].

Man skal altså ifølge Aristoteles opfylde 2 betingelser hvis man vil være borger, man skal:

  1. Kunne deltage i retsstaten
  2. Kunne deltage i demokratiet

I dag har vi mange mennesker i Danmark som har fået et borgerskab uden at opfylde disse 2 betingelser. Nogle fordi de kommer fra lande uden demokrati og retsstat, andre fordi de er direkte imod demokrati og retsstat. Og det siger sig selv, at det giver problemer, herunder:

  1. Manglende respekt for ytringsfriheden
  2. Modarbejdelse af demokratiet
  3. Løsning af konflikter med vold fremfor dialog og rettergang

Med uddannelse, vil en del kunne se fornuften i demokrati og retsstat – men der vil være en rest der er imod demokrati og retsstat.

Dette udgør en trussel imod demokratiet – og det bliver demokratiet nødt til at gøre noget ved, ellers mister de demokratiske borgere deres frihed.

 


[1] Oversat fra Aristoteles, Politics, Oxford University Press, 1995, s. 85

[2] Forfatterens kursivering

[3] Forfatterens kursivering

[4] Forfatterens kursivering

Lagt i Ikke kategoriseret | 1 Kommentar »